From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
JBeulich@suse.com, zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86,nmi: Section header fixes
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:33:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120618133305.GU32472@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120618090731.GC28824@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:07:31AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > An earlier attempt at a fix for the problem described in the second patch was
> > committed to Ingo's tree. Later a smaller/cleaner patch was posted. This
> > series just reverts the original patch and then applies the second patch.
> >
> > The second patch looks a lot cleaner this way instead of just provding the
> > delta patch on top.
> >
> > Ingo, let me know if this is not what you want.
>
> Wouldnt this be nicer as a delta enhancement, instead of a
> revert+fix-done-differently?
>
> That way we'd should that the original one was good as well,
> it's just that this one is easier to maintain.
Ok. I originally had a delta diff, but it looked ugly and hard to
understand the new changes. That is why I did it this way. I'll send the
delta enhancement and let you decide.
Cheers,
Don
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-18 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-11 15:33 [PATCH 0/2] x86,nmi: Section header fixes Don Zickus
2012-06-11 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "x86/nmi: Fix section mismatch warnings on 32-bit" Don Zickus
2012-06-11 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86,nmi: Fix section mismatch warnings on 32-bit Don Zickus
2012-06-18 9:07 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86,nmi: Section header fixes Ingo Molnar
2012-06-18 13:33 ` Don Zickus [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120618133305.GU32472@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox