From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758546Ab2FTXYE (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:24:04 -0400 Received: from s15943758.onlinehome-server.info ([217.160.130.188]:49325 "EHLO mail.x86-64.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754658Ab2FTXYC (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:24:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 01:23:59 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , "Yu, Fenghua" , X86-ML , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Andreas Herrmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, microcode: Make reload interface per system Message-ID: <20120620232359.GD2016@aftab.osrc.amd.com> References: <1340121811-4477-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> <1340121811-4477-3-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> <3E5A0FA7E9CA944F9D5414FEC6C7122007737623@ORSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com> <20120619232857.GH5996@aftab.osrc.amd.com> <1340182778.21745.75.camel@twins> <20120620230856.GA4223@khazad-dum.debian.net> <4FE2585A.3000505@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FE2585A.3000505@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 04:10:18PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > I'm wondering about the new format... it seems to potentially make it > harder to do the proper retaining of compatible CPU microcodes. .. and if you don't split the blob, you have all the ucode patches in one package. So are there any advantages in splitting the single blob? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach GM: Alberto Bozzo Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551