From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:20:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120625042017.GA11705@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120625025301.GB9317@linux-sh.org>
Hi Paul,
The patch builds fine, thank you!
Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@linux.intel.com>
Thanks,
Fengguang
> I'm really starting to loathe this header. This should take care of it:
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bug.h b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
> index 506ec19..7d10f96 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/bug.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
> @@ -3,10 +3,18 @@
>
> #include <linux/compiler.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG
> +#define BUGFLAG_WARNING (1 << 0)
> +#define BUGFLAG_TAINT(taint) (BUGFLAG_WARNING | ((taint) << 8))
> +#define BUG_GET_TAINT(bug) ((bug)->flags >> 8)
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_BUG
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG
> -#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> struct bug_entry {
> #ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS
> unsigned long bug_addr;
> @@ -23,17 +31,8 @@ struct bug_entry {
> #endif
> unsigned short flags;
> };
> -#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> -
> -#define BUGFLAG_WARNING (1 << 0)
> -#define BUGFLAG_TAINT(taint) (BUGFLAG_WARNING | ((taint) << 8))
> -#define BUG_GET_TAINT(bug) ((bug)->flags >> 8)
> -
> #endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG */
>
> -#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> -
> /*
> * Don't use BUG() or BUG_ON() unless there's really no way out; one
> * example might be detecting data structure corruption in the middle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-25 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-15 4:33 linux-next: Tree for Jun 15 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-15 6:52 ` error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE Fengguang Wu
2012-06-15 16:27 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-06-18 16:54 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-06-22 7:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-25 2:53 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-25 4:20 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2012-06-25 4:23 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-06-25 4:38 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-25 4:39 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-06-25 4:55 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-06-25 5:05 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-06-25 4:54 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-15 19:19 ` [PATCH -next] pstore: fix printk format warning in ram.c Randy Dunlap
2012-06-15 19:32 ` Kees Cook
2012-06-22 0:04 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120625042017.GA11705@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).