From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758014Ab2FZABy (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:01:54 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:38256 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757942Ab2FZABx (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:01:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:01:48 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Kay Sievers Cc: Jan Beulich , yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] syslog: fill buffer with more than a single message for SYSLOG_ACTION_READ Message-ID: <20120626000148.GA3896@kroah.com> References: <4FE4AD09020000780008B77F@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <4FE829CD020000780008B9DB@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <20120625192007.GA1005@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:35:03PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > > Ok, so I'm confused, you want me to apply this patch and then revert a > > different one?  Which one, 4a77a5a06ec66ed05199b301e7c25f42f979afdc? > > b56a39ac conflicts and is replaced with that patch. > 4a77a5a0 should stay, as it fixes an actual problem, even with the old > code, I think. Ok, I'm even more confused now. Maybe I just need more coffee. Can you list what exactly I should do here? Should I apply this patch? Revert some other patch? Which one(s)? lost, greg k-h