public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch V2 0/7] Per cpu thread hotplug infrastructure
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:26:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120626232620.GA24468@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120615140217.933711648@linutronix.de>

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:13:19PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The following series implements the infrastructure for parking and
> unparking kernel threads to avoid the full teardown and fork on cpu
> hotplug operations along with management infrastructure for hotplug
> and users.
> 
> Changes since V1:
> 
>  - Addressed the review comments
>  - Fixed a missing state update in parkme (reported by Paul)
>  - Simplified rcu_yield()
>  - Added Pauls RCU conversion
> 
> Full diffstat below. Due to the RCU cleanup we now remove more code
> than we add. :)

;-)

With the exception of a build error for CONFIG_SMP=y:

Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

I finally tracked down a hang, which turned out to be an unrelated bug
of mine that happened to be triggered more reliably with these patches
applied, hence the delay.  Sigh!

For CONFIG_SMP=y:

softirq.c:(.text+0xa6d3): undefined reference to `smpboot_thread_check_parking'
softirq.c:(.init.text+0x4aa): undefined reference to `smpboot_register_percpu_thread'
softirq.c:(.text+0xb763): undefined reference to `smpboot_thread_check_parking'
softirq.c:(.init.text+0x48e): undefined reference to `smpboot_register_percpu_thread'

My approach would be to make smpboot.o be unconditionally created by
kernel/Makefile and to use conditional compilation as needed.  The real
question is whether we want to allow parking in !SMP kernels.  I cannot
see why we wouldn't -- there might be other reasons to park besides
CPU hotplug.  Thoughts?

							Thanx, Paul

> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_irq.c |  240 ++++++++-------------
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_irq.h |    5 
>  include/linux/kthread.h               |   11 
>  include/linux/smpboot.h               |   40 +++
>  kernel/cpu.c                          |   10 
>  kernel/kthread.c                      |  184 ++++++++++++++--
>  kernel/rcutree.c                      |   12 -
>  kernel/rcutree.h                      |   15 -
>  kernel/rcutree_plugin.h               |  375 +++++-----------------------------
>  kernel/rcutree_trace.c                |    3 
>  kernel/smpboot.c                      |  206 ++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/smpboot.h                      |    4 
>  kernel/softirq.c                      |   84 +------
>  kernel/watchdog.c                     |  232 ++++++---------------
>  14 files changed, 678 insertions(+), 743 deletions(-)
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-26 23:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-15 14:13 [RFC patch V2 0/7] Per cpu thread hotplug infrastructure Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-15 14:13 ` [RFC patch V2 1/7] rcu: Yield simpler Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-15 14:13 ` [RFC patch V2 2/7] kthread: Implement park/unpark facility Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-18  8:43   ` Namhyung Kim
2012-06-18  8:50     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-15 14:13 ` [RFC patch V2 3/7] smpboot: Provide infrastructure for percpu hotplug threads Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-15 14:13 ` [RFC patch V2 4/7] softirq: Use hotplug thread infrastructure Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-15 21:49   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 14:13 ` [RFC patch V2 6/7] rcu: Use smp_hotplug_thread facility for RCUs per-CPU kthread Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-15 14:13 ` [RFC patch V2 5/7] watchdog: Use hotplug thread infrastructure Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-15 14:13 ` [RFC patch V2 7/7] infiniband: ehca: " Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-26 23:26 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-06-27  9:52   ` [RFC patch V2 0/7] Per cpu thread hotplug infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-27 14:14     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120626232620.GA24468@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox