* [GIT PULL rcu/urgent] Fix for RCU-related hang
@ 2012-06-25 22:39 Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-27 5:33 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2012-06-25 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mingo; +Cc: linux-kernel, josh, tglx, sbw
Hello, Ingo,
This series has a single patch that fixes a system hang that can occur
in perhaps unusual but very real circumstances. This hang occurs
because of a very stupid bug of mine introduced in commit b1420f1c
(Make rcu_barrier() less disruptive) that can cause CPUs to miscount
RCU callbacks. The sequence of events leading to the hang is as follows:
1. A CPU miscounts its callbacks.
2. That CPU invokes all of its callbacks, so that its callback
list is empty, but the callback count is nonzero.
3. That CPU goes offline. Because its callback list is empty,
RCU's CPU-hotplug CPU_DEAD notifiers leave both the list and
the count alone. (In contrast, had the list been non-empty,
RCU's CPU_DEAD notifiers would have emptied the list and
zeroed the count.)
4. One of the remaining CPUs executes one of the rcu_barrier()
family of primitives. The rcu_barrier() primitive notes
that the offline CPU has a non-zero count of callbacks, and
therefore hangs waiting for this count to reach zero. The
theory behind the indefinite wait is that the only reason that
an offline CPU can have a non-zero number of RCU callbacks is
that the CPU's CPU_DEAD notifiers have not yet executed.
But they already have executed, so the offlined CPU's callback
count will remain non-zero until it is brought back online,
in other words, perhaps never.
However, this bug is likely to pass a combined rcutorture/CPU-hotplug
stress test because offlined CPUs tend to be brought back online
reasonably quickly. For the rcutorture tests to fail, the system must be
in the state indicated by step #3 above at the time the "rmmod rcutorture"
executes.
The fix is simply to prevent the miscounting.
This change is available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/urgent
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul E. McKenney (1):
rcu: Stop rcu_do_batch() from multiplexing the "count" variable
kernel/rcutree.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL rcu/urgent] Fix for RCU-related hang
2012-06-25 22:39 [GIT PULL rcu/urgent] Fix for RCU-related hang Paul E. McKenney
@ 2012-06-27 5:33 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2012-06-27 5:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E. McKenney; +Cc: mingo, linux-kernel, josh, tglx, sbw
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hello, Ingo,
>
> This series has a single patch that fixes a system hang that can occur
> in perhaps unusual but very real circumstances. This hang occurs
> because of a very stupid bug of mine introduced in commit b1420f1c
> (Make rcu_barrier() less disruptive) that can cause CPUs to miscount
> RCU callbacks. The sequence of events leading to the hang is as follows:
>
> 1. A CPU miscounts its callbacks.
> 2. That CPU invokes all of its callbacks, so that its callback
> list is empty, but the callback count is nonzero.
> 3. That CPU goes offline. Because its callback list is empty,
> RCU's CPU-hotplug CPU_DEAD notifiers leave both the list and
> the count alone. (In contrast, had the list been non-empty,
> RCU's CPU_DEAD notifiers would have emptied the list and
> zeroed the count.)
> 4. One of the remaining CPUs executes one of the rcu_barrier()
> family of primitives. The rcu_barrier() primitive notes
> that the offline CPU has a non-zero count of callbacks, and
> therefore hangs waiting for this count to reach zero. The
> theory behind the indefinite wait is that the only reason that
> an offline CPU can have a non-zero number of RCU callbacks is
> that the CPU's CPU_DEAD notifiers have not yet executed.
> But they already have executed, so the offlined CPU's callback
> count will remain non-zero until it is brought back online,
> in other words, perhaps never.
>
> However, this bug is likely to pass a combined rcutorture/CPU-hotplug
> stress test because offlined CPUs tend to be brought back online
> reasonably quickly. For the rcutorture tests to fail, the system must be
> in the state indicated by step #3 above at the time the "rmmod rcutorture"
> executes.
>
> The fix is simply to prevent the miscounting.
>
> This change is available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/urgent
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Paul E. McKenney (1):
> rcu: Stop rcu_do_batch() from multiplexing the "count" variable
>
> kernel/rcutree.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Pulled, thanks Paul!
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-06-27 5:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-06-25 22:39 [GIT PULL rcu/urgent] Fix for RCU-related hang Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-27 5:33 ` Ingo Molnar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).