From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
". James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] task_work: deal with task_work callbacks adding more work
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:38:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120627183813.GD23086@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120627183721.GA23086@redhat.com>
Shamelessly stolen Al Viro's patch and the changelog, just I didn't
dare to add the proper From tag.
It doesn't matter on normal return to userland path (we'll recheck
the NOTIFY_RESUME flag anyway), but in case of exit_task_work() we'll
need that as soon as we get callbacks capable of triggering more
task_work_add().
Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/task_work.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/task_work.c b/kernel/task_work.c
index b2ff3b7..8dfc48c 100644
--- a/kernel/task_work.c
+++ b/kernel/task_work.c
@@ -76,18 +76,27 @@ void task_work_run(void)
struct task_struct *task = current;
struct task_work *last, *next, *twork;
- raw_spin_lock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
- last = task->last_twork;
- task->last_twork = (task->flags & PF_EXITING) ? TWORK_EXITED : NULL;
- raw_spin_unlock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
+ for (;;) {
+ /*
+ * twork->func() can do task_work_add(), do not
+ * set TWORK_EXITED until the list becomes empty.
+ */
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
+ last = task->last_twork;
+ if (last)
+ task->last_twork = NULL;
+ else if (task->flags & PF_EXITING)
+ task->last_twork = TWORK_EXITED;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
- if (!last)
- return;
+ if (!last)
+ return;
- next = last->next;
- do {
- twork = next;
- next = twork->next;
- twork->func(twork);
- } while (twork != last);
+ next = last->next;
+ do {
+ twork = next;
+ next = twork->next;
+ twork->func(twork);
+ } while (twork != last);
+ }
}
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-27 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-22 12:44 deferring __fput() Mimi Zohar
2012-06-23 9:20 ` Al Viro
2012-06-23 19:45 ` Al Viro
2012-06-23 20:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-23 21:01 ` Al Viro
2012-06-23 21:11 ` Al Viro
2012-06-24 4:16 ` Al Viro
2012-06-24 10:09 ` Al Viro
2012-06-24 16:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-24 15:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-25 6:03 ` Al Viro
2012-06-25 15:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-27 18:37 ` [PATCH 0/4] Was: " Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-27 18:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] task_work: use the single-linked list to shrink sizeof(task_work) Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-27 18:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] task_work: don't rely on PF_EXITING Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-27 18:38 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-06-27 18:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] task_work: kill task_work->data Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-27 19:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-28 4:38 ` [PATCH 0/4] Was: deferring __fput() Al Viro
2012-06-28 16:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-28 16:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-30 6:24 ` Al Viro
2012-06-30 17:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-29 5:30 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-06-29 8:33 ` Al Viro
2012-06-29 13:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-06-29 17:41 ` Al Viro
2012-06-29 21:38 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-06-29 23:56 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-06-30 5:02 ` Al Viro
2012-07-01 19:50 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-07-01 20:57 ` Al Viro
2012-07-02 1:46 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-07-02 3:43 ` Al Viro
2012-07-02 5:11 ` Al Viro
2012-07-02 11:49 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-07-02 12:02 ` Al Viro
2012-07-02 13:01 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-07-02 13:33 ` Al Viro
2012-07-02 14:50 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-08-21 13:05 ` [PATCH] task_work: add a scheduling point in task_work_run() Eric Dumazet
2012-08-21 20:37 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-08-21 21:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-22 3:13 ` Mimi Zohar
2012-08-22 5:27 ` Michael Wang
2012-08-22 5:38 ` Al Viro
2012-06-23 20:57 ` deferring __fput() Al Viro
2012-06-23 21:33 ` Al Viro
2012-06-24 15:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-24 18:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-25 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-25 12:14 ` Al Viro
2012-06-25 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-25 13:53 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120627183813.GD23086@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).