From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: add minimal amount of reserved erase blocks in Kconfig
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:53:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120628205303.676fa2ea@halley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340636918-7505-1-git-send-email-richard.genoud@gmail.com>
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:08:38 +0200 Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/misc.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/misc.c
> index f6a7d7a..c2c6db0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/misc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/misc.c
> @@ -100,8 +100,9 @@ void ubi_calculate_reserved(struct ubi_device *ubi)
> {
> ubi->beb_rsvd_level = ubi->good_peb_count/100;
> ubi->beb_rsvd_level *= CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_RESERVE;
BTW Artem, I've always had an unresolved issue with this original
calculation... maybe you can shed some light here.
Why 'beb_rsvd_level' is set to RESERVE percent of the 'good_peb_count'?
As the device gets worn, number of 'good_peb_count' will lessen over
time - and as such, the 'beb_rsvd_level' may vary (lessen) over time.
I'd expect a fixed number of 'beb_rsvd_level' PEBs for a given mtd
partition, or more correctly, as Richard suggests, the *sum* of bad PEBs
plus the beb reserved PEBs should be constant for a partition - as I
do not expect more than a known constant of blocks to go bad during
device's (and thus, partition's) lifetime.
Regards,
Shmulik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-28 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-25 15:08 [PATCH] UBI: add minimal amount of reserved erase blocks in Kconfig Richard Genoud
2012-06-28 14:39 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-28 16:07 ` Richard Genoud
2012-06-28 16:22 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-29 7:17 ` Richard Genoud
2012-06-29 14:10 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-29 14:57 ` Richard Genoud
2012-06-29 15:07 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-28 17:53 ` Shmulik Ladkani [this message]
2012-06-29 12:47 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-30 20:43 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-07-02 6:15 ` Richard Genoud
2012-07-03 10:46 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120628205303.676fa2ea@halley \
--to=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard.genoud@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).