From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932309Ab2GBSOs (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2012 14:14:48 -0400 Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:54029 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750861Ab2GBSOr (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2012 14:14:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 14:14:42 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Jan Kara Cc: Eric Sandeen , Artem Bityutskiy , Ext4 Mailing List , Linux FS Maling List , Linux Kernel Maling List Subject: Re: ext4 blocks up Message-ID: <20120702181442.GC5795@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , Jan Kara , Eric Sandeen , Artem Bityutskiy , Ext4 Mailing List , Linux FS Maling List , Linux Kernel Maling List References: <1341231316.2979.11.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <20120702144444.GA18074@thunk.org> <1341240862.2979.23.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <20120702151442.GB18074@thunk.org> <20120702164548.GD18074@thunk.org> <4FF1D22D.2070804@redhat.com> <20120702173104.GK6679@quack.suse.cz> <20120702174342.GA5795@thunk.org> <20120702175341.GN6679@quack.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120702175341.GN6679@quack.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 07:53:41PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > Can you send me a pointer to your patches? Is this something that Al > http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1355763.html Ah, right. OK, I didn't realize until I took a closer look that xfstests #68 was testing file system freezes while running fsstress. So Artem, what I'd suggest doing for now is to simply comment out test #68 from your xfstests's group file and just avoid running that test until this gets sorted. I simply hadn't noticed since for most of my quick checks I tend to use -g quick, and -g auto more rarely (i.e., before I push changes to Linus, and every so often during the dev cycle), and test #68 isn't run for -g quick, and it's only failing about 5-10% of the time in my test configuration. - Ted