public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: fix used-uninitialized warning in pwm_get()
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 07:58:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120704055828.GC18779@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341347661-26567-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1619 bytes --]

On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 02:34:21PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> 
> This fixes:
> drivers/pwm/core.c: In function 'pwm_get':
> drivers/pwm/core.c:534:15: warning: 'index' may be used uninitialized in this function
> 
> The addition to the if condition at end of the function isn't strictly
> necessary to solve the warning, but does make it more obvious that the
> initialization of "index" to a dummy value isn't just hiding the
> problem.

Actually this seems to be a false positive, and one that I don't see (I
use GCC 4.6.3). index will be initialized when chip is set in the loop.
My guess is that GCC 4.6.3 actually notices while your version doesn't.

Thierry

> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/core.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
> index dbab530..2b401c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
> @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ struct pwm_device *pwm_get(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
>  	struct pwm_chip *chip = NULL;
>  	unsigned int best = 0;
>  	struct pwm_lookup *p;
> -	unsigned int index;
> +	unsigned int index = -1;
>  	unsigned int match;
>  
>  	/* look up via DT first */
> @@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ struct pwm_device *pwm_get(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (chip)
> +	if (chip && index != -1)
>  		pwm = pwm_request_from_chip(chip, index, con_id ?: dev_id);
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&pwm_lookup_lock);
> -- 
> 1.7.0.4
> 
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-04  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-03 20:34 [PATCH] pwm: fix used-uninitialized warning in pwm_get() Stephen Warren
2012-07-04  5:58 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2012-07-05 15:56   ` Stephen Warren
2012-07-11  6:39     ` Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120704055828.GC18779@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de \
    --to=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox