From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933725Ab2GDHua (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2012 03:50:30 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:64300 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932986Ab2GDHuZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2012 03:50:25 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 11:50:20 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Pavel Emelyanov Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Al Viro , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrew Morton , James Bottomley Subject: Re: [rfc 3/7] procfs: Add ability to plugin auxiliary fdinfo providers Message-ID: <20120704075020.GC1999@moon> References: <20120627110116.201735815@openvz.org> <20120627110512.574379921@openvz.org> <4FF3F332.5030302@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FF3F332.5030302@parallels.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 11:39:30AM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > > How about introducing one more file_operations member and call it in the > seq_show() (if exists)? Only inotify, eventfd and eventpoll will implement > one. This will allow to avoid all this complexity with drivers. Hmm. Thanks for idea, I need to estimate which impact it will have. Will ping back once it's done. Cyrill