From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756757Ab2GEPmA (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 11:42:00 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:54215 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751179Ab2GEPl6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 11:41:58 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: Fix runtime warning caused by duplicate device registration Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 15:41:51 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.5.0-rc1+; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Mark Brown , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, sameo@linux.intel.com References: <20120703132447.GN29030@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120705141329.GN4111@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FF5A61F.2050400@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <4FF5A61F.2050400@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201207051541.52261.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:ZfTtEQj7+E6MhoEix4ywJaL1VNTBfc7yGr+zSapxKdO 5I0LfFvg/h3yNixyAiA3Oimzna9YuWIUmxt6KluA58x50g8/wk uIJIbFOymLGRhaEOIQuUU5D+6jqkCgyiYL5ItEiUjBBOc3LhbS C+0DLsbygH59zyj/besKOH7CeIO3meHgyhQXZRO3hMlzODQJbv iV2t4+iWj0DYrAA6QezdbbBJYjwvbqChnjVssSXB+mcz6ohXJB +Au8H/1yF32WiV4xod21HCAcPzQwrpyCOdR3uQH9oJTcrvr3gy vbnHqlpRoiXP3y0vhP6UinqgLGCrzhaCmUEshvKxM9UNycVk3S A2HOSKAK1SNaPMg5I4DM= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 05 July 2012, Lee Jones wrote: > > On 05/07/12 15:13, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:06:20PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > >> On 05/07/12 14:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > >>> The non-DT path for this is a huge mess, I'd rather focus on making > >>> it obsolete than trying to fix it. Other than that, I agree that > >>> we should be registering the ab8500 from the prcmu from both the > >>> DT and the non-DT case. > > > >> Ah, is that what you were saying Mark? > > > >> If so, I apologise. I thought you meant register both from platform > >> code. I'm happy to register the AB8500 from the DB8500 for both DT > >> and !DT. > > > > Yes, that's what I was trying to say - sorry that I wasn't clear! > > Well it seems silly of me just to copy Arnd's work. Do you want to > author and submit the patch to do this Arnd? No, just assume ownership of it. I haven't tried building the patch, so I assume you will have to change it some more. Just list me as Suggested-by:. Arnd