From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, levinsasha928@gmail.com
Subject: [GIT RFC PULL rcu/urgent] Revert to fix RCU-related deadlock/softlockup
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 09:16:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120705161644.GA10670@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Hello, Ingo,
This series has a single revert from the ill-starred attempt to inline
__rcu_read_lock() for preemptible RCU. Without this revert, on mainline
kernels using CONFIG_RCU_BOOST there is a low-probability deadlock on the
runqueue locks, but one that actually appeared in Sasha Levin's testing.
With the revert, and with an diagnostic patch that increased probability
of the deadlock to a MTBF of roughly 10 seconds, Sasha's tests ran for
two days with no failure.
The sequence of events leading to the deadlock is as follows:
1. A task enters an RCU read-side critical section, and is both
preempted and subjected to RCU priority boosting.
2. The task starts to exit its RCU read-side critical section,
but is preempted in __rcu_read_unlock() just after the assignment
setting t->rcu_read_lock_nesting to INT_MIN. (The diagnostic
patch mentioned above expands this window by ten microseconds,
and is available in -rcu as a debug option queued for 3.7.)
3. The task enters the scheduler, where it acquires the corresponding
runqueue lock, then invokes rcu_switch_from() which in turn
invokes rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(), which in turn invokes
rcu_read_unlock_special(), which attempts to deboost the task.
4. The attempt to deboost the task recursively enters the scheduler
with a runqueue lock held, which can result in deadlock.
The revert moves the point at which rcu_preempt_note_context_switch() is
called to a point in the scheduler code before the runqueue lock is
acquired, avoiding the deadlock.
This pull is marked "RFC" because CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y is not used much
outside of the real-time community. I will be sending another pull
request later today (Pacific Time) for 3.6 RCU commits, which will
include this commit as well. Your choice. ;-)
This change is available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/urgent
Thanx, Paul
------------------>
Paul E. McKenney (1):
Revert "rcu: Move PREEMPT_RCU preemption to switch_to() invocation"
arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c | 1 -
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 1 -
include/linux/rcutiny.h | 6 ++++++
include/linux/sched.h | 10 ----------
kernel/rcutree.c | 1 +
kernel/rcutree.h | 1 +
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 14 +++++++++++---
kernel/sched/core.c | 1 -
8 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2012-07-05 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-05 16:16 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-07-06 9:20 ` [GIT RFC PULL rcu/urgent] Revert to fix RCU-related deadlock/softlockup Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120705161644.GA10670@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox