From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757876Ab2GFRgj (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 13:36:39 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:35275 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757652Ab2GFRgh (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 13:36:37 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: ujUHs+L0mfwyobqCfD8MyXTxRo+ovgHEcyisxqhgUtuZ 1341596197 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 10:36:35 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Chris Metcalf Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arch/tile: provide kernel support for the tilegx USB shim Message-ID: <20120706173635.GB2373@kroah.com> References: <201206162048.q5GKm1rt019464@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201206162048.q5GKm1rt019464@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:25:02PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > This change adds support for accessing the USB shim from within the > kernel. Note that this change by itself does not allow the kernel > to act as a host or as a device; it merely exposes the built-in on-chip > hardware to the kernel. What do you mean by this? This is needed for the other patches, right? If so, I'm guessing they are going through the tile tree? That's fine with me. thanks, greg k-h