From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>,
linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Subject: Re: [RESEND AGAIN][PATCH] pcmcia: move unbind/rebind into dev_pm_ops.complete
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 14:59:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120709145939.80537e0e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120706213016.GA15424@kroah.com>
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 14:30:16 -0700
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 11:23:52PM +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> > The idea of moving rebind procedure into pm.complete
> > was taken from the usb-subsystem, which has similar
> > problems with reattaching devices during/after
> > resume.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
> > ---
> > To Greg:
> >
> > I have submitted this patch back in March and again in May.
> > As far as I can tell it was neither rejected nor was it
> > accepted into linux-pcmcia.git since. So I'm asking you,
> > if you could take the patch instead... please.
>
> There is a PCMCIA "team" who should be taking these types of patches.
> Why are they not doing so?
>
Things are pretty quiet in pcmcia world, but Dominik does appear to
still be doing stuff.
I sometimes queue PCMCIA patches for people, but not this one. The
changelog is just junk. What does the patch do? Why does it do it?
What problems does it solve? What are these mysterious "problems with
reattaching devices" to which it refers? Useless...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-09 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-06 21:23 [RESEND AGAIN][PATCH] pcmcia: move unbind/rebind into dev_pm_ops.complete Christian Lamparter
2012-07-06 21:30 ` Greg KH
2012-07-09 21:59 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-07-09 22:54 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-07-09 23:01 ` Andrew Morton
2012-07-09 23:07 ` Christian Lamparter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-09 23:19 Christian Lamparter
2012-07-10 14:20 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120709145939.80537e0e.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox