* [PATCH] kernel: fix mishandling of out of memory in poweroff @ 2012-07-04 15:34 Alan Cox 2012-07-10 20:15 ` Andrew Morton 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Alan Cox @ 2012-07-04 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, akpm From: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Coverity 703573 Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> --- kernel/sys.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c index b04ae03..9271b7c 100644 --- a/kernel/sys.c +++ b/kernel/sys.c @@ -2212,13 +2212,13 @@ int orderly_poweroff(bool force) ret = call_usermodehelper_fns(argv[0], argv, envp, UMH_NO_WAIT, NULL, argv_cleanup, NULL); -out: if (likely(!ret)) return 0; if (ret == -ENOMEM) argv_free(argv); +out: if (force) { printk(KERN_WARNING "Failed to start orderly shutdown: " "forcing the issue\n"); ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kernel: fix mishandling of out of memory in poweroff 2012-07-04 15:34 [PATCH] kernel: fix mishandling of out of memory in poweroff Alan Cox @ 2012-07-10 20:15 ` Andrew Morton 2012-07-10 21:37 ` Scan Subscription 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Andrew Morton @ 2012-07-10 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-kernel, Scan Subscription On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:34:51 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > From: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> > > Coverity 703573 > > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> It would be nice to have a Reported-by here, but we were only given "Scan Subscription <scan-subscription@coverity.com>". Is there some human behind these reports? If so, can that person's details please be included? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] kernel: fix mishandling of out of memory in poweroff 2012-07-10 20:15 ` Andrew Morton @ 2012-07-10 21:37 ` Scan Subscription 2012-07-11 9:30 ` Ozan Çağlayan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Scan Subscription @ 2012-07-10 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Morton, Alan Cox, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii", Size: 2557 bytes --] Hi Andew, The two reports that were sent on 6/28 and 7/6, were sent manually by us, Coverit Scan Admin, project dedicated for Open Source Community. But going forward (next week), it will be completely automated. Based on the suggestions we got from some of the lead Linux Developer, weekly report includes only "Newly" discovered defects from the code change in that week, and will be sent to maintainer and to the community. There are on an avg. 5-10 new defects in a week, sometime none. Any one who wants to contact the person for the reports being sent, they can use the details provided at the end of the email that is scan-admin@coverity.com However, we are open to suggestions. Reasons for using generic email 1. It is desgined to be automated, but so far it was manuall. 2. There are group of people behind this email and not just one. So, anyone who is available will respond. 3. Other Open Source community has shown the same interest to generate report on newly discoverd defect every time build is commited to Scan, and we use the same generic email address to subscribe and to send the reoprt to their mailing list, instead of creating separate email for each Open Source project. Hence, using either scan-admin@coverity.com or scan-subscription@coverity.com would be fine, but better would be to use the one in the email signaure, that is, scan-admin@coverity.com We will add "Reported By" in the next report. However, as I said, we are open to suggestions. Thanks Coverity Scan-Admin scan-admin@coverity.com Dakshesh Vyas | Technical Manager - SCAN Coverity | 185 Berry Street | Suite 6500, Lobby 3 | San Francisco, CA 94107 Office: 415.935.2957 | dvyas@coverity.com http://scan.coverity.com ________________________________________ From: Andrew Morton [akpm@linux-foundation.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 1:15 PM To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Scan Subscription Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: fix mishandling of out of memory in poweroff On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:34:51 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > From: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> > > Coverity 703573 > > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> It would be nice to have a Reported-by here, but we were only given "Scan Subscription <scan-subscription@coverity.com>". Is there some human behind these reports? If so, can that person's details please be included?ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(階ŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kernel: fix mishandling of out of memory in poweroff 2012-07-10 21:37 ` Scan Subscription @ 2012-07-11 9:30 ` Ozan Çağlayan 2012-07-11 9:35 ` richard -rw- weinberger 2012-07-11 11:22 ` Cong Wang 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Ozan Çağlayan @ 2012-07-11 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Alan Cox, Scan Subscription > It would be nice to have a Reported-by here, but we were only given > "Scan Subscription <scan-subscription@coverity.com>". > > Is there some human behind these reports? If so, can that person's > details please be included? Also note that gmail marks these as "Spam" probably because of the word "subscription". Regards, -- Ozan Çağlayan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kernel: fix mishandling of out of memory in poweroff 2012-07-11 9:30 ` Ozan Çağlayan @ 2012-07-11 9:35 ` richard -rw- weinberger 2012-07-11 11:22 ` Cong Wang 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: richard -rw- weinberger @ 2012-07-11 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ozan Çağlayan Cc: linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, Alan Cox, Scan Subscription On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Ozan Çağlayan <ozancag@gmail.com> wrote: >> It would be nice to have a Reported-by here, but we were only given >> "Scan Subscription <scan-subscription@coverity.com>". >> >> Is there some human behind these reports? If so, can that person's >> details please be included? > > Also note that gmail marks these as "Spam" probably because of the > word "subscription". Not here. -- Thanks, //richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] kernel: fix mishandling of out of memory in poweroff 2012-07-11 9:30 ` Ozan Çağlayan 2012-07-11 9:35 ` richard -rw- weinberger @ 2012-07-11 11:22 ` Cong Wang 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Cong Wang @ 2012-07-11 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ozan Çağlayan Cc: linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, Alan Cox, Scan Subscription (I can't find Alan's initial email, so reply to this one.) Hi, Alan, I sent a same patch few minutes ahead of yours: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=134137296531838 and got some ACK's already. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-11 11:22 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-07-04 15:34 [PATCH] kernel: fix mishandling of out of memory in poweroff Alan Cox 2012-07-10 20:15 ` Andrew Morton 2012-07-10 21:37 ` Scan Subscription 2012-07-11 9:30 ` Ozan Çağlayan 2012-07-11 9:35 ` richard -rw- weinberger 2012-07-11 11:22 ` Cong Wang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox