Re: [PATCH] usb: twl6030-usb: variable otg not declared in twl6030_usbotg_irq() in linux-next

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:32:20PM -0700, Gerard Snitselaar wrote:
> commit ff9cce82 added back 2 lines that were removed by commit
> c83a8542 causing build of twl6030-usb to get an error due to otg being
> referenced, but not declared. This patch removes those 2 lines again
> to restore intent of commit c83a8542.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gerard Snitselaar <dev@snitselaar.org>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c b/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c
> index a3d0c04..6907d8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c
> @@ -302,8 +302,6 @@ static irqreturn_t twl6030_usbotg_irq(int irq, void *_twl)
>  		twl6030_writeb(twl, TWL_MODULE_USB, 0x1, USB_ID_INT_EN_HI_CLR);
>  		twl6030_writeb(twl, TWL_MODULE_USB, 0x10, USB_ID_INT_EN_HI_SET);
>  		status = OMAP_MUSB_ID_GROUND;
> -		otg->default_a = true;
> -		twl->phy.state = OTG_STATE_A_IDLE;

Didn't I apply this same patch yesterday?  Can you verify that this is
still needed in the usb-next branch of my git tree?

confused,

greg k-h