Re: [PATCH] usb: twl6030-usb: variable otg not declared in twl6030_usbotg_irq() in linux-next

[Gerard Snitselaar <dev@snitselaar.org>]

Yes, ignore my patch. It was applied to usb-next already and I forgot to check there.

Jerry

On Tue Jul 10 12, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:32:20PM -0700, Gerard Snitselaar wrote:
> > commit ff9cce82 added back 2 lines that were removed by commit
> > c83a8542 causing build of twl6030-usb to get an error due to otg being
> > referenced, but not declared. This patch removes those 2 lines again
> > to restore intent of commit c83a8542.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Gerard Snitselaar <dev@snitselaar.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c | 2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c b/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c
> > index a3d0c04..6907d8d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/otg/twl6030-usb.c
> > @@ -302,8 +302,6 @@ static irqreturn_t twl6030_usbotg_irq(int irq, void *_twl)
> >  		twl6030_writeb(twl, TWL_MODULE_USB, 0x1, USB_ID_INT_EN_HI_CLR);
> >  		twl6030_writeb(twl, TWL_MODULE_USB, 0x10, USB_ID_INT_EN_HI_SET);
> >  		status = OMAP_MUSB_ID_GROUND;
> > -		otg->default_a = true;
> > -		twl->phy.state = OTG_STATE_A_IDLE;
> 
> Didn't I apply this same patch yesterday?  Can you verify that this is
> still needed in the usb-next branch of my git tree?
> 
> confused,
> 
> greg k-h