From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Need to let kill_proc() send signal to doomed process
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:44:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120710154410.GA29892@aftab.osrc.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f830ac24f491389b0246af0fb31d0546f3583380.1341866155.git.tony.luck@intel.com>
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:34:36PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> In commit dad1743e5993f19b3d7e7bd0fb35dc45b5326626
> x86/mce: Only restart instruction after machine check recovery if it is safe
>
> we fixed mce_notify_process() to force a signal to the current process
> if it was not restartable (RIPV bit not set in MCG_STATUS). But doing
> it here means that the process doesn't get told the virtual address of
> the fault via siginfo_t->si_addr. This would prevent application level
> recovery from the fault.
>
> Make a new MF_MUST_KILL flag bit for memory_failure() et. al. to use
> so that we will provide the right information with the signal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> ---
>
> v2: Fix brainfart where I forgot to check mi->restartable to decide whether
> to pass in the new MF_MUST_KILL bit [Thanks Boris for spotting this!]
> Use same style syntax !!(flags & MF_MUST_KILL) [Also from Boris]
> Faked tests with RIPV set and not set ... and found that we need one
> more check on MF_MUST_KILL earlier in hwpoison_user_mappings() to
> make sure it doesn't think the clean page case is recoverable.
Ok, now it makes pretty good sense.
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-10 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-06 21:33 [PATCH] x86/mce: Need to let kill_proc() send signal to doomed process Tony Luck
2012-07-07 4:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-07-09 16:22 ` Luck, Tony
2012-07-09 20:34 ` Tony Luck
2012-07-10 15:44 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2012-07-10 17:12 ` Tony Luck
2012-07-10 18:36 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120710154410.GA29892@aftab.osrc.amd.com \
--to=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox