From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756239Ab2GJQnt (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:43:49 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:47941 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753999Ab2GJQns (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:43:48 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="166346969" Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:55:18 +0200 From: Samuel Ortiz To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: ab8500: Clean-up the last two ab8500 related DT match tables Message-ID: <20120710165518.GG15345@sortiz-mobl> References: <1341578598-9307-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120710091304.GU15345@sortiz-mobl> <4FFC4A23.5000107@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FFC4A23.5000107@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Lee, On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:28:35PM +0200, Lee Jones wrote: > On 10/07/12 11:13, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > >Hi Lee, > > > >On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 01:43:18PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > >>A patch was recently submitted to stop all ab8500 devices from > >>being registered through Device Tree. Instead, only the db8500 > >>will be DT:ed and the rest will continue to be registered via > >>the MFD API, as they always were. > >> > >>Two patches have recently been applied which enable Device Tree > >>probing; one for rtc-ab8500 and the other for ponkey-ab8500. > >>These two need to be removed to prevent double-probing these > >>devices with Device Tree is enabled. > >> > >>Cc: Samuel Ortiz > >>Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > >>--- > >> drivers/input/misc/ab8500-ponkey.c | 8 -------- > >> drivers/rtc/rtc-ab8500.c | 6 ------ > >> 2 files changed, 14 deletions(-) > >I don't know against which tree you generated those patches, but none of those > >2 of_device_id arrays are in my for-next branch. So I can't apply this patch. > > I can rebase them on anything of your choosing. > > What is your for-next branch based on? On Linus' tree. And the of_device_id arrays are not there. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/