From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
Cc: SteveD@redhat.com, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vivek Trivedi <vtrivedi018@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs-util: Add cache_flush in mountd UMNT procedure.
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:09:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120711140944.GB11432@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKYAXd97ir=tvxWTC4eVmrrXBEpK=XCX3-e8XUjCPy16eHoibQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 01:10:53PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> 2012/7/10, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>:
> > On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 11:17:39PM -0400, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> >> For removing storage device - user needs to safely un-mount the device
> >> and then eject. But if 'EBUSY' occurs in umount then it will create
> >> confusion for the user as it will mean some I/O is in progress - and
> >> won't allow user to safely ejecting device.
> >
> Hi James.
> > The one drawback is that recovering from the cache flushes might be a
> > little expensive if you have a lot of exports in use.
> Good point. I will look for more there is the method flush only mount entry.
I don't think there's a good way to flush only one entry.
Also, this isn't going to help for NFSv4 since a v4 client won't do an
unmount call.
> > I'm curious, since you said this was for a usb disk: are users expected
> > to just unplug it (in which case--is it read only?) or do they have some
> > way of unmounting before they pull the plug?
> Users expected to unplug it on both read only and read/write.
> And there is no way that system be prepared to know about the
> intelligence when the user is going to unplug.
> if the user really want to detach the device safely. There is an
> option like the desktop PC - where, we can say - umount/eject the
> device. There is a proper user interface for safe removal.
> but they can not unplug safely if usb device is mounted with nfs
> because of this issue.
Ideal might be to get some way to notify nfsd when the device
diseappears or the filesystem wants to unmount. I don't know how to do
that.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-11 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-08 3:17 [PATCH] nfs-util: Add cache_flush in mountd UMNT procedure Namjae Jeon
2012-07-10 14:59 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-07-11 4:10 ` Namjae Jeon
2012-07-11 14:09 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2012-07-11 22:38 ` Namjae Jeon
2012-07-11 22:43 ` Namjae Jeon
2012-07-24 16:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-07-28 4:52 ` Namjae Jeon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120711140944.GB11432@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vtrivedi018@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox