From: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
To: "Purdila, Octavian" <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] resource: make sure requested range intersects root range
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:54:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120711145412.GA2430@ram-ThinkPad-T61> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE1zotK=2nK_pRsg8C6MuGqOKZut96MgWy-ru2dkPOQQF--U3Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 02:06:10PM +0300, Purdila, Octavian wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Wait.. I am not sure this will fix the problem entirely. The above check
> > will handle the case where the range requested is entirey out of the
> > root's range. But if the requested range overlapps that of the root
> > range, we will still call __reserve_region_with_split() and end up with
> > a recursion if there is a overflow. Wont we?
> >
>
> Good catch. I will fix this as well as address Andrew's and Joe's
> comments in a new patch. The only question is how to handle the
> overlap case:
>
> (a) abort the whole request or
>
> (b) try to reserve the part that overlaps (and adjust the request to
> avoid the overflow)
>
> I think (b) is more in line with the current implementation for reservations.
I prefer (b). following patch should handle that.
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index e1d2b8e..dd87fde 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -780,6 +780,10 @@ static void __init __reserve_region_with_split(struct resource *root,
if (conflict->start > start)
__reserve_region_with_split(root, start, conflict->start-1, name);
+
+ if (conflict->end == parent->end )
+ return;
+
if (conflict->end < end)
__reserve_region_with_split(root, conflict->end+1, end, name);
}
RP
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-11 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-30 12:00 [PATCH] resource: make sure requested range intersects root range Octavian Purdila
2012-07-10 21:33 ` Andrew Morton
2012-07-11 1:25 ` Joe Perches
2012-07-11 2:09 ` Ram Pai
2012-07-11 11:06 ` Purdila, Octavian
2012-07-11 14:54 ` Ram Pai [this message]
2012-07-11 15:26 ` Purdila, Octavian
2012-07-12 2:02 ` Ram Pai
2012-07-12 8:56 ` Ram Pai
[not found] ` <CAE1zot+iKwg5uijy7mWbxrQ3KUFYoKXuSYc0OnADmrWu7EtgLw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120712163026.GG2430@ram-ThinkPad-T61>
2012-07-12 16:49 ` Purdila, Octavian
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-03 8:40 Octavian Purdila
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120711145412.GA2430@ram-ThinkPad-T61 \
--to=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=octavian.purdila@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox