From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] uprobes: uprobe_mmap/munmap needs list_for_each_entry_safe()
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:29:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712055906.GD3598@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120708203001.GA18223@redhat.com>
* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> [2012-07-08 22:30:01]:
> The bug was introduced by me in 449d0d7c "uprobes: Simplify the
> usage of uprobe->pending_list".
>
> Yes, we do not care about uprobe->pending_list after return and
> nobody can remove the current list entry, but put_uprobe(uprobe)
> can actually free it and thus we need list_for_each_safe().
>
> Reported-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/events/uprobes.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index 67697db..a93b6df 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -1010,7 +1010,7 @@ static void build_probe_list(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *head)
> int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> struct list_head tmp_list;
> - struct uprobe *uprobe;
> + struct uprobe *uprobe, *u;
> struct inode *inode;
> int ret, count;
>
> @@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> ret = 0;
> count = 0;
>
> - list_for_each_entry(uprobe, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(uprobe, u, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
> if (!ret) {
> loff_t vaddr = vma_address(vma, uprobe->offset);
>
> @@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> void uprobe_munmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> {
> struct list_head tmp_list;
> - struct uprobe *uprobe;
> + struct uprobe *uprobe, *u;
> struct inode *inode;
>
> if (!atomic_read(&uprobe_events) || !valid_vma(vma, false))
> @@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@ void uprobe_munmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned lon
> mutex_lock(uprobes_mmap_hash(inode));
> build_probe_list(inode, &tmp_list);
>
> - list_for_each_entry(uprobe, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(uprobe, u, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
> loff_t vaddr = vma_address(vma, uprobe->offset);
>
> if (vaddr >= start && vaddr < end) {
> --
> 1.5.5.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-08 20:29 [PATCH 0/5] uprobes: misc fixlets Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-08 20:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] uprobes: uprobe_mmap/munmap needs list_for_each_entry_safe() Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-12 5:59 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2012-07-08 20:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] uprobes: suppress uprobe_munmap() from mmput() Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-09 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-09 10:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-09 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-09 10:25 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-12 5:57 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-08 20:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] uprobes: fix overflow in vma_address/find_active_uprobe Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-08 21:18 ` Joe Perches
2012-07-09 10:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-12 5:56 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-08 20:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] uprobes: kill copy_vma()->uprobe_mmap() Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-09 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-09 10:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-13 8:13 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-08 20:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] uprobes: kill insert_vm_struct()->uprobe_mmap() Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-13 8:11 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-13 13:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-13 14:02 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-13 14:02 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120712055906.GD3598@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).