From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933121Ab2GLI6o (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 04:58:44 -0400 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk ([81.2.110.251]:59332 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932106Ab2GLI6j (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 04:58:39 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:02:13 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Ian Abbott Cc: H Hartley Sweeten , Linux Kernel , "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" , Ian Abbott , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/30] staging: comedi: move 'struct pci_dev *' into comedi_device Message-ID: <20120712100213.4be0e50f@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <4FFE9102.2090204@mev.co.uk> References: <201207111447.47402.hartleys@visionengravers.com> <4FFE9102.2090204@mev.co.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I suppose at a later date we could turn that into a union with a short > name like u (so comedidev->pcidev would become something like > comedidev->u.pcidev), which would allow us to stick a 'struct > usb_interface *' or some other hardware device wrapper struct pointer in > the same hole. (Maybe 'h' for 'hardware' would be better than 'u'.) The "usual" pattern is to make it a struct device pointer. Then you can get to any other kind of device from it. Alan