public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/4] hfsplus: stop using write_supers and s_dirt
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:09:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712160951.74cbb3c1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1342103191-17406-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com>

On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:26:27 +0300
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Andrew, here is v3 of the patches, could you please pick them instead of the
> ones you have in your tree?

I really do dislike dropping patches and replacing them.  For a whole
bunch of reasons.  One of which is that a wholesale replacement
requires a full re-review.  Another is that wholesale replacement makes
it hard to see what was changed.

> The differences to v2 are:
> 
> 1. checkpatch.pl warnings fixed
> 2. removed 'cancel_delayed_work()' from 'hfsplus_sync_fs()' because it is not
>    enough to just cancel the job, we need to set the work_queued flag to zero
>    as well. I could do this, but it is simpler to just remove this tiny
>    optimization - we do not gain much with it. I caught this bug while doing
>    some more testing.

And lo, when I look at "what was changed", I see that this patchset
actually does *not* remove the cancel_delayed_work() call.  What's up
with that?

This latest patchset is identical to the code which is presently in -mm.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-12 23:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-12 14:26 [PATCHv3 0/4] hfsplus: stop using write_supers and s_dirt Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-12 14:26 ` [PATCHv3 1/4] hfsplus: make hfsplus_sync_fs static Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-12 14:26 ` [PATCHv3 2/4] hfsplus: amend debugging print Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-12 14:26 ` [PATCHv3 3/4] hfsplus: remove useless check Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-12 14:26 ` [PATCHv3 4/4] hfsplus: get rid of write_super Artem Bityutskiy
2012-07-12 23:09 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-07-12 23:17   ` [PATCHv3 0/4] hfsplus: stop using write_supers and s_dirt Andrew Morton
2012-07-13  5:41   ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120712160951.74cbb3c1.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox