From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934364Ab2GMBtq (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:49:46 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:65417 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933082Ab2GMBto (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:49:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 18:49:39 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Rolf Offermanns , Sujith Manoharan , Senthil Balasubramanian , Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan , "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [ 22/68] ath9k_hw: avoid possible infinite loop in ar9003_get_pll_sqsum_dvc Message-ID: <20120713014939.GA6732@kroah.com> References: <20120712175057.GA9917@kroah.com> <20120712175035.530652872@linuxfoundation.org> <20120712175037.411246837@linuxfoundation.org> <20120713013835.GA3121@herton-Z68MA-D2H-B3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120713013835.GA3121@herton-Z68MA-D2H-B3> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:38:35PM -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 04:01:56PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > From: Greg KH > > > > 3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan > > > > commit f18e3c6b67f448ec47b3a5b242789bd3d5644879 upstream. > > > > "ath9k: Fix softlockup in AR9485" with commit id > > 64bc1239c790e051ff677e023435d770d2ffa174 fixed the reported > > issue, yet its better to avoid the possible infinite loop > > in ar9003_get_pll_sqsum_dvc by having a timeout as suggested > > by ath9k maintainers. > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg92126.html. > > Based on my testing PLL's locking measurement is done in > > ~200us (2 iterations). > > Missing the rest of the patch here. Yeah, quilt went crazy and messed things up, the originals are fine, but something went really wrong when the mbox was created, sorry. A number of different patches didn't go through properly. greg k-h