public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH RFT] regulator: palmas: Fix calcuating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps
@ 2012-07-17  3:29 Axel Lin
  2012-07-17  8:45 ` Graeme Gregory
  2012-07-17 10:08 ` Mark Brown
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Axel Lin @ 2012-07-17  3:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Brown; +Cc: linux-kernel, Graeme Gregory, Liam Girdwood

The logic of calculating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps() does not match
the logic to list voltage in palmas_list_voltage_smps().

We use below equation to calculate voltage when selector > 0:
        voltage = (0.49V + (selector * 0.01V)) * RANGE
RANGE is either x1 or x2

So we need to take into account with the multiplier set in VSEL register when
calculating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps()

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c |   17 ++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
index 7540c95..17d19fb 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
@@ -373,11 +373,22 @@ static int palmas_set_voltage_smps_sel(struct regulator_dev *dev,
 static int palmas_map_voltage_smps(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 		int min_uV, int max_uV)
 {
+	struct palmas_pmic *pmic = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
+	int id = rdev_get_id(rdev);
 	int ret, voltage;
 
-	ret = ((min_uV - 500000) / 10000) + 1;
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ret;
+	if (min_uV == 0)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (pmic->range[id]) { /* RANGE is x2 */
+		if (min_uV < 1000000)
+			min_uV = 1000000;
+		ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_uV - 1000000, 20000) + 1;
+	} else {		/* RANGE is x1 */
+		if (min_uV < 500000)
+			min_uV = 500000;
+		ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_uV - 500000, 10000) + 1;
+	}
 
 	/* Map back into a voltage to verify we're still in bounds */
 	voltage = palmas_list_voltage_smps(rdev, ret);
-- 
1.7.9.5




^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RFT] regulator: palmas: Fix calcuating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps
  2012-07-17  3:29 [PATCH RFT] regulator: palmas: Fix calcuating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps Axel Lin
@ 2012-07-17  8:45 ` Graeme Gregory
  2012-07-17 10:08 ` Mark Brown
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Graeme Gregory @ 2012-07-17  8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Axel Lin; +Cc: Mark Brown, linux-kernel, Liam Girdwood

Good catch, thanks I totally forgot about the range bit in that function.

Acked-by: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>

On 17/07/12 04:29, Axel Lin wrote:
> The logic of calculating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps() does not match
> the logic to list voltage in palmas_list_voltage_smps().
>
> We use below equation to calculate voltage when selector > 0:
>         voltage = (0.49V + (selector * 0.01V)) * RANGE
> RANGE is either x1 or x2
>
> So we need to take into account with the multiplier set in VSEL register when
> calculating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps()
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c |   17 ++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
> index 7540c95..17d19fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
> @@ -373,11 +373,22 @@ static int palmas_set_voltage_smps_sel(struct regulator_dev *dev,
>  static int palmas_map_voltage_smps(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
>  		int min_uV, int max_uV)
>  {
> +	struct palmas_pmic *pmic = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +	int id = rdev_get_id(rdev);
>  	int ret, voltage;
>  
> -	ret = ((min_uV - 500000) / 10000) + 1;
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> +	if (min_uV == 0)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (pmic->range[id]) { /* RANGE is x2 */
> +		if (min_uV < 1000000)
> +			min_uV = 1000000;
> +		ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_uV - 1000000, 20000) + 1;
> +	} else {		/* RANGE is x1 */
> +		if (min_uV < 500000)
> +			min_uV = 500000;
> +		ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_uV - 500000, 10000) + 1;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* Map back into a voltage to verify we're still in bounds */
>  	voltage = palmas_list_voltage_smps(rdev, ret);



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RFT] regulator: palmas: Fix calcuating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps
  2012-07-17  3:29 [PATCH RFT] regulator: palmas: Fix calcuating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps Axel Lin
  2012-07-17  8:45 ` Graeme Gregory
@ 2012-07-17 10:08 ` Mark Brown
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2012-07-17 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Axel Lin; +Cc: linux-kernel, Graeme Gregory, Liam Girdwood

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 215 bytes --]

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:29:03AM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> The logic of calculating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps() does not match
> the logic to list voltage in palmas_list_voltage_smps().

Applied, thanks.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-17 10:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-17  3:29 [PATCH RFT] regulator: palmas: Fix calcuating selector in palmas_map_voltage_smps Axel Lin
2012-07-17  8:45 ` Graeme Gregory
2012-07-17 10:08 ` Mark Brown

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox