* uprobe: checking probe event include directory
@ 2012-07-17 10:12 Jovi Zhang
2012-07-17 10:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jovi Zhang @ 2012-07-17 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt, Frédéric Weisbecker, Ingo Molnar, LKML
>From 16ed13ee9098ae01705e8456005d1ad6d9909128 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 01:16:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] uprobe: checking probe event include directory
Currently below command run successful:
$ echo 'p /bin:0x4245c0' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
this don't make sense, because /bin is a directory,
so make this checking earily, not report error untill probe enable.
Signed-off-by: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 85158fa..cf382de 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -259,6 +259,11 @@ static int create_trace_uprobe(int argc, char **argv)
goto fail_address_parse;
inode = igrab(path.dentry->d_inode);
+ if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ pr_info("probe file cannot be directory.\n");
+ goto fail_address_parse;
+ }
argc -= 2;
argv += 2;
--
1.7.9.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: uprobe: checking probe event include directory
2012-07-17 10:12 uprobe: checking probe event include directory Jovi Zhang
@ 2012-07-17 10:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-07-17 17:27 ` Srikar Dronamraju
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2012-07-17 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jovi Zhang, Srikar Dronamraju; +Cc: Steven Rostedt, Ingo Molnar, LKML
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:12:28PM +0800, Jovi Zhang wrote:
> From 16ed13ee9098ae01705e8456005d1ad6d9909128 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 01:16:23 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] uprobe: checking probe event include directory
>
> Currently below command run successful:
> $ echo 'p /bin:0x4245c0' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
>
> this don't make sense, because /bin is a directory,
> so make this checking earily, not report error untill probe enable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
Adding Srikar in Cc.
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> index 85158fa..cf382de 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> @@ -259,6 +259,11 @@ static int create_trace_uprobe(int argc, char **argv)
> goto fail_address_parse;
>
> inode = igrab(path.dentry->d_inode);
> + if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + pr_info("probe file cannot be directory.\n");
> + goto fail_address_parse;
> + }
>
> argc -= 2;
> argv += 2;
> --
> 1.7.9.7
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: uprobe: checking probe event include directory
2012-07-17 10:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
@ 2012-07-17 17:27 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-18 2:36 ` Jovi Zhang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Srikar Dronamraju @ 2012-07-17 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker, Jovi Zhang; +Cc: Steven Rostedt, Ingo Molnar, LKML
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> [2012-07-17 12:59:39]:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:12:28PM +0800, Jovi Zhang wrote:
> > From 16ed13ee9098ae01705e8456005d1ad6d9909128 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
> > Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 01:16:23 +0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] uprobe: checking probe event include directory
> >
> > Currently below command run successful:
> > $ echo 'p /bin:0x4245c0' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
good catch.
> >
> > this don't make sense, because /bin is a directory,
> > so make this checking earily, not report error untill probe enable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
>
> Adding Srikar in Cc.
>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> > index 85158fa..cf382de 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> > @@ -259,6 +259,11 @@ static int create_trace_uprobe(int argc, char **argv)
> > goto fail_address_parse;
> >
> > inode = igrab(path.dentry->d_inode);
> > + if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
How about checking for regular files but not directory.
i.e it should avoid tracing special files
Something like:
if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + pr_info("probe file cannot be directory.\n");
we could drop the pr_info line here, since we would any print we
failed to parse the address.
Probably you could change the last pr_info from
pr_info("Failed to parse address.\n");
to
pr_info("Failed to parse address or file.\n");
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar
> > + goto fail_address_parse;
> > + }
> >
> > argc -= 2;
> > argv += 2;
> > --
> > 1.7.9.7
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: uprobe: checking probe event include directory
2012-07-17 17:27 ` Srikar Dronamraju
@ 2012-07-18 2:36 ` Jovi Zhang
[not found] ` <20120718110731.GE5006@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jovi Zhang @ 2012-07-18 2:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Srikar Dronamraju; +Cc: Frederic Weisbecker, Steven Rostedt, Ingo Molnar, LKML
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Srikar Dronamraju
<srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> [2012-07-17 12:59:39]:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:12:28PM +0800, Jovi Zhang wrote:
>> > From 16ed13ee9098ae01705e8456005d1ad6d9909128 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 01:16:23 +0800
>> > Subject: [PATCH] uprobe: checking probe event include directory
>> >
>> > Currently below command run successful:
>> > $ echo 'p /bin:0x4245c0' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
>
> good catch.
>
>> >
>> > this don't make sense, because /bin is a directory,
>> > so make this checking earily, not report error untill probe enable.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
>>
>> Adding Srikar in Cc.
>>
>> > ---
>> > kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 5 +++++
>> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
>> > index 85158fa..cf382de 100644
>> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
>> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
>> > @@ -259,6 +259,11 @@ static int create_trace_uprobe(int argc, char **argv)
>> > goto fail_address_parse;
>> >
>> > inode = igrab(path.dentry->d_inode);
>> > + if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
>
> How about checking for regular files but not directory.
> i.e it should avoid tracing special files
>
> Something like:
>
> if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
>
>> > + ret = -EINVAL;
>> > + pr_info("probe file cannot be directory.\n");
>
> we could drop the pr_info line here, since we would any print we
> failed to parse the address.
>
> Probably you could change the last pr_info from
>
> pr_info("Failed to parse address.\n");
>
> to
>
> pr_info("Failed to parse address or file.\n");
>
>
Thanks srikar, try below patch:
>From dd37d3cc563e2619ec325d6c11d769a32def411b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:16:44 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] uprobe: checking uprobe event inode valid
Currently below command run successful:
$ echo 'p /bin:0x4245c0' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
this don't make sense, because /bin is a directory,
we need to check uprobe event inode valid more earily.
Signed-off-by: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 85158fa..3b5f646 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -259,6 +259,10 @@ static int create_trace_uprobe(int argc, char **argv)
goto fail_address_parse;
inode = igrab(path.dentry->d_inode);
+ if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto fail_address_parse;
+ }
argc -= 2;
argv += 2;
@@ -358,7 +362,7 @@ fail_address_parse:
if (inode)
iput(inode);
- pr_info("Failed to parse address.\n");
+ pr_info("Failed to parse address or file.\n");
return ret;
}
--
1.7.9.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [offlist] uprobe: checking probe event include directory
[not found] ` <20120718110731.GE5006@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
@ 2012-07-18 11:38 ` Jovi Zhang
2012-07-18 11:45 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-11-19 9:40 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jovi Zhang @ 2012-07-18 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Srikar Dronamraju, Frédéric Weisbecker, Steven Rostedt,
LKML
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Srikar Dronamraju
<srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> The patch looks good,
>
> Can you modify the description a bit. However you are free to ignore
> these comments. After knowing your response, I will ack the patch.
>
> I would probably put this as:
>
> The subject could be
> tracing: Verify target file before registering a uprobe event
>
> Description:
> Without this patch, we can register a uprobe event for a directory.
> Enabling such a uprobe event would anyway fail.
>
> Example:
>
> $ echo 'p /bin:0x4245c0' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
>
> However directories cannot be valid targets for uprobe.
> Hence verify if the target is a regular file during the probe
> registration.
Thanks srikar, your description is more clear than mine.
>From fd5077196038cc271e2116e1fca359a0011e1669 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:16:44 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Verify target file before registering a uprobe
event
Without this patch, we can register a uprobe event for a directory.
Enabling such a uprobe event would anyway fail.
Example:
$ echo 'p /bin:0x4245c0' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
However dirctories cannot be valid targets for uprobe.
Hence verify if the target is a regular file during the probe
registration.
Signed-off-by: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 85158fa..3b5f646 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -259,6 +259,10 @@ static int create_trace_uprobe(int argc, char **argv)
goto fail_address_parse;
inode = igrab(path.dentry->d_inode);
+ if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto fail_address_parse;
+ }
argc -= 2;
argv += 2;
@@ -358,7 +362,7 @@ fail_address_parse:
if (inode)
iput(inode);
- pr_info("Failed to parse address.\n");
+ pr_info("Failed to parse address or file.\n");
return ret;
}
--
1.7.9.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: uprobe: checking probe event include directory
2012-07-18 11:38 ` [offlist] " Jovi Zhang
@ 2012-07-18 11:45 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-12 0:20 ` Jovi Zhang
2012-11-19 9:40 ` Steven Rostedt
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Srikar Dronamraju @ 2012-07-18 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jovi Zhang; +Cc: Fr?d?ric Weisbecker, Steven Rostedt, LKML
* Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com> [2012-07-18 19:38:27]:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Srikar Dronamraju
> <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > The patch looks good,
> >
> > Can you modify the description a bit. However you are free to ignore
> > these comments. After knowing your response, I will ack the patch.
> >
> > I would probably put this as:
> >
> > The subject could be
> > tracing: Verify target file before registering a uprobe event
> >
> > Description:
> > Without this patch, we can register a uprobe event for a directory.
> > Enabling such a uprobe event would anyway fail.
> >
> > Example:
> >
> > $ echo 'p /bin:0x4245c0' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
> >
> > However directories cannot be valid targets for uprobe.
> > Hence verify if the target is a regular file during the probe
> > registration.
>
> Thanks srikar, your description is more clear than mine.
>
>
> From fd5077196038cc271e2116e1fca359a0011e1669 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:16:44 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Verify target file before registering a uprobe
> event
>
> Without this patch, we can register a uprobe event for a directory.
> Enabling such a uprobe event would anyway fail.
>
> Example:
> $ echo 'p /bin:0x4245c0' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
>
> However dirctories cannot be valid targets for uprobe.
> Hence verify if the target is a regular file during the probe
> registration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> index 85158fa..3b5f646 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> @@ -259,6 +259,10 @@ static int create_trace_uprobe(int argc, char **argv)
> goto fail_address_parse;
>
> inode = igrab(path.dentry->d_inode);
> + if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto fail_address_parse;
> + }
>
> argc -= 2;
> argv += 2;
> @@ -358,7 +362,7 @@ fail_address_parse:
> if (inode)
> iput(inode);
>
> - pr_info("Failed to parse address.\n");
> + pr_info("Failed to parse address or file.\n");
>
> return ret;
> }
Looks good.
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: uprobe: checking probe event include directory
2012-07-18 11:45 ` Srikar Dronamraju
@ 2012-10-12 0:20 ` Jovi Zhang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jovi Zhang @ 2012-10-12 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Srikar Dronamraju, Steven Rostedt, LKML
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Srikar Dronamraju
<srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> * Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com> [2012-07-18 19:38:27]:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Srikar Dronamraju
>> <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > The patch looks good,
>> >
>> > Can you modify the description a bit. However you are free to ignore
>> > these comments. After knowing your response, I will ack the patch.
>> >
>> > I would probably put this as:
>> >
>> > The subject could be
>> > tracing: Verify target file before registering a uprobe event
>> >
>> > Description:
>> > Without this patch, we can register a uprobe event for a directory.
>> > Enabling such a uprobe event would anyway fail.
>> >
>> > Example:
>> >
>> > $ echo 'p /bin:0x4245c0' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
>> >
>> > However directories cannot be valid targets for uprobe.
>> > Hence verify if the target is a regular file during the probe
>> > registration.
>>
>> Thanks srikar, your description is more clear than mine.
>>
>>
>> From fd5077196038cc271e2116e1fca359a0011e1669 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:16:44 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Verify target file before registering a uprobe
>> event
>>
>> Without this patch, we can register a uprobe event for a directory.
>> Enabling such a uprobe event would anyway fail.
>>
>> Example:
>> $ echo 'p /bin:0x4245c0' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
>>
>> However dirctories cannot be valid targets for uprobe.
>> Hence verify if the target is a regular file during the probe
>> registration.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 6 +++++-
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
>> index 85158fa..3b5f646 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
>> @@ -259,6 +259,10 @@ static int create_trace_uprobe(int argc, char **argv)
>> goto fail_address_parse;
>>
>> inode = igrab(path.dentry->d_inode);
>> + if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto fail_address_parse;
>> + }
>>
>> argc -= 2;
>> argv += 2;
>> @@ -358,7 +362,7 @@ fail_address_parse:
>> if (inode)
>> iput(inode);
>>
>> - pr_info("Failed to parse address.\n");
>> + pr_info("Failed to parse address or file.\n");
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>
> Looks good.
>
> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
Hi Andrew,
Is this patch ok to go through your tree?
.jovi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: uprobe: checking probe event include directory
2012-07-18 11:38 ` [offlist] " Jovi Zhang
2012-07-18 11:45 ` Srikar Dronamraju
@ 2012-11-19 9:40 ` Steven Rostedt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2012-11-19 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jovi Zhang; +Cc: Srikar Dronamraju, Frédéric Weisbecker, LKML
I've been cleaning out my inbox and found this patch hasn't made it into
mainline yet.
There were a couple of versions of the patch in this thread. Please
re-submit the final version with the associated acks. And not within
this thread.
Patches that are added to replies in threads seldom get applied.
-- Steve
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 19:38 +0800, Jovi Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Srikar Dronamraju
> <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > The patch looks good,
> >
> > Can you modify the description a bit. However you are free to ignore
> > these comments. After knowing your response, I will ack the patch.
> >
> > I would probably put this as:
> >
> > The subject could be
> > tracing: Verify target file before registering a uprobe event
> >
> > Description:
> > Without this patch, we can register a uprobe event for a directory.
> > Enabling such a uprobe event would anyway fail.
> >
> > Example:
> >
> > $ echo 'p /bin:0x4245c0' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
> >
> > However directories cannot be valid targets for uprobe.
> > Hence verify if the target is a regular file during the probe
> > registration.
>
> Thanks srikar, your description is more clear than mine.
>
>
> >From fd5077196038cc271e2116e1fca359a0011e1669 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:16:44 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Verify target file before registering a uprobe
> event
>
> Without this patch, we can register a uprobe event for a directory.
> Enabling such a uprobe event would anyway fail.
>
> Example:
> $ echo 'p /bin:0x4245c0' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
>
> However dirctories cannot be valid targets for uprobe.
> Hence verify if the target is a regular file during the probe
> registration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> index 85158fa..3b5f646 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> @@ -259,6 +259,10 @@ static int create_trace_uprobe(int argc, char **argv)
> goto fail_address_parse;
>
> inode = igrab(path.dentry->d_inode);
> + if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto fail_address_parse;
> + }
>
> argc -= 2;
> argv += 2;
> @@ -358,7 +362,7 @@ fail_address_parse:
> if (inode)
> iput(inode);
>
> - pr_info("Failed to parse address.\n");
> + pr_info("Failed to parse address or file.\n");
>
> return ret;
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-19 9:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-17 10:12 uprobe: checking probe event include directory Jovi Zhang
2012-07-17 10:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-07-17 17:27 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-18 2:36 ` Jovi Zhang
[not found] ` <20120718110731.GE5006@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-07-18 11:38 ` [offlist] " Jovi Zhang
2012-07-18 11:45 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-12 0:20 ` Jovi Zhang
2012-11-19 9:40 ` Steven Rostedt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox