Re: [PATCH] uprobe: fix misleading log entry

[Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

* Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com> [2012-07-18 11:08:42]:

> From 68232ef2decae95b807f2f3763e8ea99c1a3b2ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:51:26 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] uprobe: fix misleading log entry
> 
> There don't have any 'r' prefix in uprobe event naming, remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> index cf382de..852a584 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static int create_trace_uprobe(int argc, char **argv)
>  	if (argv[0][0] == '-')
>  		is_delete = true;
>  	else if (argv[0][0] != 'p') {
> -		pr_info("Probe definition must be started with 'p', 'r' or" " '-'.\n");
> +		pr_info("Probe definition must be started with 'p' or '-'.\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> 

Yes, uprobes doesnt support return probes. So we should not have
mentioned about r.

Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>