From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>
Cc: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 v2] Honor state disabling in the cpuidle ladder governor
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:30:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207192130.20520.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120719190740.215034590@osadl.org>
On Thursday, July 19, 2012, Carsten Emde wrote:
> There are two cpuidle governors ladder and menu. While the ladder
> governor is always available, if CONFIG_CPU_IDLE is selected, the
> menu governor additionally requires CONFIG_NO_HZ.
>
> A particular C state can be disabled by writing to the sysfs file
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/cpuidle/stateN/disable, but this mechanism
> is only implemented in the menu governor. Thus, in a system where
> CONFIG_NO_HZ is not selected, the ladder governor becomes default and
> always will walk through all sleep states - irrespective of whether the
> C state was disabled via sysfs or not. The only way to select a specific
> C state was to write the related latency to /dev/cpu_dma_latency and
> keep the file open as long as this setting was required - not very
> practical and not suitable for setting a single core in an SMP system.
>
> With this patch, the ladder governor only will promote to the next
> C state, if it has not been disabled, and it will demote, if the
> current C state was disabled.
>
> Note that the patch does not make the setting of the sysfs variable
> "disable" coherent, i.e. if one is disabling a light state, then all
> deeper states are disabled as well, but the "disable" variable does not
> reflect it. Likewise, if one enables a deep state but a lighter state
> still is disabled, then this has no effect. A related section has been
> added to the documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>
Your patch doesn't seem to take this linux-next commit:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git;a=commit;h=dc7fd275ae60ef8edf952aff2a62462f5d892fd4
into account, does it?
Rafael
> ---
> Documentation/cpuidle/sysfs.txt | 10 +++++++++-
> drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-3.4.4-rt14-rc2-64/Documentation/cpuidle/sysfs.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.4.4-rt14-rc2-64.orig/Documentation/cpuidle/sysfs.txt
> +++ linux-3.4.4-rt14-rc2-64/Documentation/cpuidle/sysfs.txt
> @@ -76,9 +76,17 @@ total 0
>
>
> * desc : Small description about the idle state (string)
> -* disable : Option to disable this idle state (bool)
> +* disable : Option to disable this idle state (bool) -> see note below
> * latency : Latency to exit out of this idle state (in microseconds)
> * name : Name of the idle state (string)
> * power : Power consumed while in this idle state (in milliwatts)
> * time : Total time spent in this idle state (in microseconds)
> * usage : Number of times this state was entered (count)
> +
> +Note:
> +The behavior and the effect of the disable variable depends on the
> +implementation of a particular governor. In the ladder governor, for
> +example, it is not coherent, i.e. if one is disabling a light state,
> +then all deeper states are disabled as well, but the disable variable
> +does not reflect it. Likewise, if one enables a deep state but a lighter
> +state still is disabled, then this has no effect.
> Index: linux-3.4.4-rt14-rc2-64/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.4.4-rt14-rc2-64.orig/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
> +++ linux-3.4.4-rt14-rc2-64/drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ static int ladder_select_state(struct cp
>
> /* consider promotion */
> if (last_idx < drv->state_count - 1 &&
> + !drv->states[last_idx + 1].disable &&
> last_residency > last_state->threshold.promotion_time &&
> drv->states[last_idx + 1].exit_latency <= latency_req) {
> last_state->stats.promotion_count++;
> @@ -100,7 +101,8 @@ static int ladder_select_state(struct cp
>
> /* consider demotion */
> if (last_idx > CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START &&
> - drv->states[last_idx].exit_latency > latency_req) {
> + (drv->states[last_idx].disable ||
> + drv->states[last_idx].exit_latency > latency_req)) {
> int i;
>
> for (i = last_idx - 1; i > CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; i--) {
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-19 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-17 18:59 [PATCH 0/1] cpuidle: allow to disable C states of the ladder governor Carsten Emde
2012-07-17 18:59 ` [PATCH 1/1] Honor state disabling in the cpuidle " Carsten Emde
2012-07-18 6:36 ` Deepthi Dharwar
2012-07-18 11:02 ` Carsten Emde
2012-07-18 11:48 ` Deepthi Dharwar
2012-07-18 14:09 ` [PATCH 1/1 v2] Honor state disabling in the cpuidle ladder governor - documented Carsten Emde
2012-07-18 14:38 ` [PATCH 1/1 v3] Honor state disabling in the cpuidle ladder governor - with sanitizer Carsten Emde
2012-07-19 11:14 ` Deepthi Dharwar
2012-07-19 11:39 ` Carsten Emde
2012-07-19 18:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-19 18:52 ` [PATCH 0/1 v2] cpuidle: allow to disable C states of the ladder governor Carsten Emde
2012-07-19 18:52 ` [PATCH 1/1 v2] Honor state disabling in the cpuidle " Carsten Emde
2012-07-19 19:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-07-19 20:34 ` [PATCH 0/1 v3] cpuidle: allow to disable C states of the " Carsten Emde
2012-07-19 20:34 ` [PATCH 1/1 v3] Honor state disabling in the cpuidle " Carsten Emde
2012-07-19 21:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-19 22:22 ` Carsten Emde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201207192130.20520.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).