public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mce: Add quirk for instruction recovery on Sandy Bridge processors
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:18:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120720121848.GA29183@aftab.osrc.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <180a06f3f357cf9f78259ae443a082b14a29535b.1342723082.git.tony.luck@intel.com>

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:28:46AM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> Sandy Bridge processors follow the SDM (Vol 3B, Table 15-20) and set
> both the RIPV and EIPV bits in the MCG_STATUS register to zero for
> machine checks during instruction fetch. This is more than a little
> counter-intuitive and means that Linux cannot recover from these
> errors. Rather than insert special case code at several places in mce.c
> and mce-severity.c, we pretend the EIPV bit was set for just this case
> early in processing the machine check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

Looks ok, just minor nitpick below.

> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> index da27c5d..e65e738 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,8 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(mce_banks_t, mce_poll_banks) = {
>  
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct, mce_work);
>  
> +static void (*quirk_no_way_out)(int bank, struct mce *m, struct pt_regs *regs);
> +
>  /*
>   * CPU/chipset specific EDAC code can register a notifier call here to print
>   * MCE errors in a human-readable form.
> @@ -649,14 +651,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(machine_check_poll);
>   * Do a quick check if any of the events requires a panic.
>   * This decides if we keep the events around or clear them.
>   */
> -static int mce_no_way_out(struct mce *m, char **msg, unsigned long *validp)
> +static int mce_no_way_out(struct mce *m, char **msg, unsigned long *validp,
> +			  struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
>  	int i, ret = 0;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < banks; i++) {
>  		m->status = mce_rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_STATUS(i));
> -		if (m->status & MCI_STATUS_VAL)
> +		if (m->status & MCI_STATUS_VAL) {
>  			__set_bit(i, validp);
> +			if (quirk_no_way_out)
> +				quirk_no_way_out(i, m, regs);

Maybe define a default empty quirk_no_way_out() on the remaining
families/vendors so that the compiler can optimize it away and we save
ourselves the if-test?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-20 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-19 18:38 [PATCH 0/2] Fix machine check recovery for instruction fault on Sandy Bridge Tony Luck
2012-07-19 18:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/mce: Move MCACOD defines from mce-severity.c to <asm/mce.h> Tony Luck
2012-07-19 18:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/mce: Add quirk for instruction recovery on Sandy Bridge processors Tony Luck
2012-07-20 12:18   ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2012-07-20 16:33     ` Tony Luck
2012-07-21 12:45       ` Borislav Petkov
2012-07-23 16:11         ` Luck, Tony
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-23 21:21 [PATCH 0/2] Fix machine check recovery for instruction fault on Sandy Bridge Tony Luck
2012-07-19 18:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/mce: Add quirk for instruction recovery on Sandy Bridge processors Tony Luck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120720121848.GA29183@aftab.osrc.amd.com \
    --to=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox