From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753491Ab2G2UZO (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:25:14 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:54098 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753363Ab2G2UZN (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:25:13 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 21:25:10 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de, olalilja@yahoo.se, ola.o.lilja@stericsson.com, sameo@linux.intel.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lrg@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too Message-ID: <20120729202510.GB4384@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1343392734-11805-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1343392734-11805-2-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1343392734-11805-2-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> X-Cookie: You dialed 5483. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:38:48PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > If a list of widgets is provided and one of them fails to be added as > a control, the present semantics fail all subsequent widgets. A better > solution would be to only fail that widget, but pursue in attempting > to add the rest of the list. You've completely ignored my question about why this is better. This is also *clearly* not an urgent bugfix.