Re: NULL pointer dereference in iio_buffer_register()

[Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>]

> > The panic happens while trying to dereference the NULL indio_dev->buffer:
> > 
> >         266 int iio_buffer_register(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >         267                         const struct iio_chan_spec *channels,
> >         268                         int num_channels)
> >         269 {  
> >         270         struct iio_dev_attr *p;
> >         271         struct attribute **attr;
> >         272         struct iio_buffer *buffer = indio_dev->buffer;
> >         273         int ret, i, attrn, attrcount, attrcount_orig = 0;
> >         274 
> > ==>     275         if (buffer->attrs)
> >         276                 indio_dev->groups[indio_dev->groupcounter++] = buffer->attrs;
> > 
> > iio_dummy_probe() has the code to configure that buffer, however
> > iio_simple_dummy_configure_buffer() is defined to do nothing on
> > !CONFIG_IIO_SIMPLE_DUMMY_BUFFER..
> > 
> >         448         /* Configure buffered capture support. */
> > ==>     449         ret = iio_simple_dummy_configure_buffer(indio_dev);
> >         450         if (ret < 0)
> >         451                 goto error_unregister_events;
> >         452 
> >         453         /*
> >         454          * Register the channels with the buffer, but avoid the output
> >         455          * channel being registered by reducing the number of channels by 1.
> >         456          */
> >         457         ret = iio_buffer_register(indio_dev, iio_dummy_channels, 5);
> >         458         if (ret < 0)
> >         459                 goto error_unconfigure_buffer;
> > 
> > Any ideas to fix it?
> > 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think the best would be to move the iio_buffer_register to
> iio_simple_dummy_configure_buffer.

Lars, thanks for the quick reply! Hmm, that looks more like a code
refactor recommendation than fix ;)  In the simplest form, can the
bug fixed like this?

  static inline int iio_simple_dummy_configure_buffer(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
  {
-         return 0;
+         return -1;
  };

Thanks,
Fengguang