From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754264Ab2GaOXT (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:23:19 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:53560 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754119Ab2GaOXQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:23:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:23:14 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Alex Courbot Cc: Simon Glass , Stephen Warren , Thierry Reding , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 1/3] runtime interpreted power sequences Message-ID: <20120731142313.GU4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1343390750-3642-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <1343390750-3642-2-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <50179933.9090501@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50179933.9090501@nvidia.com> X-Cookie: Give him an evasive answer. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 05:37:07PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > On 07/30/2012 08:00 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > >For the delay, I think milliseconds is reasonable. I suppose there is > >no reasonable need for microseconds? > I don't see any need for microseconds myself - anybody sees use for > finer-grained delays? Bouncing reset lines, often the time required for reset is down in the microseconds.