From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754883Ab2GaOyu (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:54:50 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:41041 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754563Ab2GaOyq (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:54:46 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:54:44 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de, olalilja@yahoo.se, ola.o.lilja@stericsson.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lrg@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too Message-ID: <20120731145443.GY4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1343741493-17671-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1343741493-17671-3-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120731134214.GK4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <5017EAC3.3080504@linaro.org> <20120731142820.GW4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <5017EDCA.4020601@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5017EDCA.4020601@linaro.org> X-Cookie: Give him an evasive answer. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 03:38:02PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > Neither of those are in my Inbox. Blame Mozilla. :) You might want to look at a better mail program. > It's better because the whole audio system doesn't fail in the case > of minor failure. It'd be like calling off a football game (or > whatever you're into) because one of the substitutes ruptured an > eyelash. It shouldn't make any difference to startup - we should still be checking errors and failing the init if we're failing to add links, this isn't something that's likely to randomly break on a particular boot, it's more something that indicates nobody bothered testing. It's certainly totally inappropriate for an "urgent" bugfix. > During start-up the ux500 has a couple of very unimportant widgets > fail. It's the wrong behavior to force failure on the everything > audio just because of that. Fixes for those errors, however...