From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755007Ab2GaPSX (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:18:23 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:60691 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754874Ab2GaPSW (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:18:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:18:20 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de, olalilja@yahoo.se, ola.o.lilja@stericsson.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lrg@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too Message-ID: <20120731151819.GC4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1343741493-17671-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1343741493-17671-3-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120731134214.GK4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <5017EAC3.3080504@linaro.org> <20120731142820.GW4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <5017EDCA.4020601@linaro.org> <20120731145443.GY4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <5017F68B.3060400@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5017F68B.3060400@linaro.org> X-Cookie: Give him an evasive answer. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 04:15:23PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On 31/07/12 15:54, Mark Brown wrote: > >You might want to look at a better mail program. > Willingly. Any good suggestions? mutt works for me. > >It's certainly totally inappropriate for an "urgent" bugfix. > Well it just means that audio won't work for the ux500 for this > kernel release, but as we're waiting on clocks, this isn't a big > issue for us. If you do take it (with or without the return code), > feel free to add it to for-next instead of the -rc:s I'm not going to apply this patch. This isn't a vendor BSP, we shouldn't be putting random hacks like this in core code.