From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Alex Kelly <alex.page.kelly@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/get_maintainer.pl: Default to --no-rolestats when output not a terminal
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 20:57:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120804035702.GA2788@leaf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344040650.10710.22.camel@joe2Laptop>
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 05:37:30PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 11:47 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:33:21AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 11:27 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > > scripts/get_maintainer.pl defaults to showing --rolestats, which
> > > > provides annotations explaining why each person or list might want to
> > > > know about a patch. This works well for interactive use, but breaks
> > > > when used with git send-email's --to-cmd or --cc-cmd, resulting in
> > > > malformed email headers and mails sent to some but not all recipients.
> > > >
> > > > To avoid the need to explicitly pass --no-rolestats for batch use,
> > > > enable --rolestats by default only when outputting to a terminal.
> > >
> > > Hi Josh.
> > >
> > > I think it's preferable to add --no-rolestats
> > > to the uses that need them.
> >
> > Why?
> >
> > > I have different scripts that I use for git send-email
> > > options --to-cmd and --cc-cmd
> > [...snip scripts...]
> >
> > You've submitted enough patches that you've automated as much of the
> > process as you can; I don't think that makes the defaults less
> > error-prone.
>
> I think the default use of the get_maintainer script is
> actually not scripted but interactive, where the user is
> just trying to figure out who the maintainer is.
I agree entirely; that's why I didn't change the default to always use
--no-rolestats, but rather to continue using --rolestats when
interactive and --no-rolestats when scripted.
> > As it stands now, the current default of --rolestats makes the obvious
> > command line of
> > git send-email --to-cmd='scripts/get_maintainer.pl' *.patch
> > send broken emails that go to some maintainers but not all. I think it
> > makes sense to change the default so that the obvious usage becomes the
> > correct one.
>
> There were some discussions awhile back in 2010 about the
> preferred defaults.
>
> Perhaps you can read those discussions about why the default
> is the way it is.
I found commit 7e1863af1636b304a5f59aab6fb78d38e4079875, but that commit
does not serve the intended purpose. Defaulting to --rolestats doesn't
make it "harder" to use get_maintainer.pl with git send-email, it just
makes it broken when used. Meanwhile, the few discussions I see about
get_maintainer.pl just mention the problems caused by using --git, and
get_maintainer.pl has already improved to address those problems by not
using git commit signers for patches to files with active maintainers.
I don't see any value in making it intentionally harder to invoke
correctly while making it easier to invoke incorrectly. Why not make it
actually work?
- Josh Triplett
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-04 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-03 18:27 [PATCH] scripts/get_maintainer.pl: Default to --no-rolestats when output not a terminal Josh Triplett
2012-08-03 18:33 ` Joe Perches
2012-08-03 18:47 ` Josh Triplett
2012-08-04 0:37 ` Joe Perches
2012-08-04 3:57 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120804035702.GA2788@leaf \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.page.kelly@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox