public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: anish kumar <anish198519851985@gmail.com>
Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
	patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] extcon: arizona: Implement button detection support
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 11:00:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120804100046.GB9248@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344062254.1525.239.camel@anish-Inspiron-N5050>

On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 12:07:34PM +0530, anish kumar wrote:

> According to my discussion with Mr. Myunjoo Ham.He said that single
> driver should not be used for communicating with both extcon and input
> subsystem and that is the reason he suggested that I split the samsung
> jack driver into two separate drivers.

> First driver to communicate with extcon about headset insertion/removal.
> Second driver is to communicate with input subsystem to report headset
> button press/release.

> I have followed this approach and coded and it seems to be working fine,
> but looking at this patch I feel there is no need to separate as
> both insertion/removal and button press/release is reported using a
> single driver.
> I am good with any approach but just wanted to let you know what I am
> going to post soon.

For this hardware splitting really isn't practical - the hardware and
state machine for button interaction and basic detection are the same,
I think all we could do with separate drivers is have a core which
called back into subdrivers which have the sole purpose of propagating
reports up the stack.

      reply	other threads:[~2012-08-04 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-20 16:07 [PATCH] extcon: arizona: Implement button detection support Mark Brown
2012-07-25  6:09 ` Chanwoo Choi
2012-07-25 11:11   ` Mark Brown
2012-07-26  0:10     ` Chanwoo Choi
2012-07-26  8:11       ` Mark Brown
2012-07-27  6:45         ` Chanwoo Choi
2012-08-04  6:37   ` anish kumar
2012-08-04 10:00     ` Mark Brown [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120804100046.GB9248@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=anish198519851985@gmail.com \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
    --cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox