From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756670Ab2HFPiA (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:38:00 -0400 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:57003 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755694Ab2HFPh6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:37:58 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:37:52 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de, linux-input@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: ab8500-ponkey: Make the distinction between DT and non-DT boots Message-ID: <20120806153750.GI10524@gmail.com> References: <1344256323-10484-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120806081915.GA4518@core.coreip.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20120806081915.GA4518@core.coreip.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:19:15AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > - ponkey->irq_dbf = ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbf); > > - ponkey->irq_dbr = ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbr); > > + > > + ponkey->irq_dbf = (np) ? ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbf) : irq_dbf; > > + ponkey->irq_dbr = (np) ? ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbr) : irq_dbr; > > Why this isn't done inside ab8500_irq_get_virq()? There's no reason why it can't be. My first version of the patch did just that in fact. Would that be your preference? -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog