Re: [PATCH 0/5] mfd: replace IORESOURCE_IO by IORESOURCE_MEM

Mark Brown
2012-08-06T15:58:09Z

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:56:47PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Mark Brown

> > Right, but _MEM isn't terribly relevant either. If anything _IO is a
> > bit better as ioports are *somewhat* similar to registers.

> The problem is that each bit is already used in 32-bit IORESOURCE. I can't
> find a empty bit to define the new IORESOURCE.

That's one reason why I've not attacked this problem myself, but frankly
I'm totally happy with using _IO here so I've not looked particularly
closely.