Re: [PATCH 0/5] mfd: replace IORESOURCE_IO by IORESOURCE_MEM

[Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>]

On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 12:35:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 11:28:27AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> > I've looked through the code some more and your solution sounds
> > like the best option to get this sorted quickly. The entire
> 
> There's no disagreement here, if someone actually wrote a patch we might
> get somewhere here.  That said, as I just pointed out in my mail to
> Russell this is an issue for stable too.

Is this simple enough for you?  Maybe if you told me:

1. what you'd like these new resources to be called
2. which are the affected mfd drivers

I could create a better patch.

 include/linux/ioport.h |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
index 589e0e7..9798319 100644
--- a/include/linux/ioport.h
+++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct resource {
 #define IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS	0x00001f00	/* Resource type */
 #define IORESOURCE_IO		0x00000100
 #define IORESOURCE_MEM		0x00000200
+#define IORESOURCE_FOO		0x00000300
 #define IORESOURCE_IRQ		0x00000400
 #define IORESOURCE_DMA		0x00000800
 #define IORESOURCE_BUS		0x00001000


-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of: