From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756606Ab2HGU3N (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 16:29:13 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:54915 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751184Ab2HGU3L (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 16:29:11 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Dongjin Kim Subject: Re: =?euc-kr?q?=C8=B8=BD=C5=3A_=5BPATCH_2/4=5D_arm/dts=3A_exynos4=3A_Add_DTS?= =?euc-kr?q?_files_derived_from_common?= Exynos4 Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 20:29:08 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.5.0; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Dongjin Kim , Russell King , Thomas Abraham , Kukjin Kim , Grant Likely , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <1344366398-19022-1-git-send-email-dongjin.kim@agreeyamobility.net> <201208071938.26507.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="euc-kr" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201208072029.08693.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:FMZ6Jp+DFrxzfuLdGb04ujQM1mHkGSciDOJYG6C+Xxw Vz/J58fddpMPhDKKewVJQMdr43lLIBcndidx57ypONG5lc6i7Y wbUj2c36glxIQSMe7DdUegcqu8bH197Ug3a8EMwCz/zHDFcb5t 5j2kgc4ikwtef6RIcLWSTWbAib3vjDq4Vv6luRLsnecIfscoUw ivfLwHsPKO7W2FOl6UJcvrZHqzA5z7TO/Qq34I+/O19bIaNmOp xOS5SeihVeI38b5ESMBcG5XU5gehWEXd2FJeGZQx28m/o6szLm PTcsLd58EyH0aIoy0G2TgBwfOZlNUToWK7vMIKjVXqiYLRcWYv 48FD4ergTry5LFXsSJm4= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Dongjin Kim wrote: > Hi, > > I didn't use -M and I couldn't see any difference with the it. > Did I make something wrong on that patch? No, I think it's just git being less smart about file moves than I was hoping for. It might do the right thing if you do the patch in two steps: 1. rename exynos4210.dtsi to exynos4.dtsi and add a one-line exynos4210.dtsi file that just includes exynos4.dtsi. 2. do all the changes for moving contents back from exynos4.dtsi into exynos4210.dtsi and exynos4412.dtsi. Not sure if it's worth it though. Your version is probably good enough if there are no tools to do a better job automatically. Arnd