From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932588Ab2HHJBN (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Aug 2012 05:01:13 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([193.178.161.156]:48321 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757881Ab2HHJBI (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Aug 2012 05:01:08 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: "Linux-sh list" Subject: [PATCH 0/4] PM / shmobile: Specify PM domain and device latency information directly Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 00:26:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.5.0+; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Linux PM list , LKML , Magnus Damm References: <201207212349.18294.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <201207212349.18294.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201208080026.01738.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, On Saturday, July 21, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi all, > > The following patchset is on top of the previous one at: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/16/399 > > Generally speaking, it adds code for the direct specification of various > PM domain and device latencies used by PM QoS to the SH7372 SoC and > Mackerel board and suggests a mechanism for reading that information from > device trees. Since I haven't received any comments, I suppose everyone is OK with these patches, except for the DT one that depended on another DT patch that was rejected. Thus, a regular (non-RFC) submission follows. The patches are on top of this patch series posted yesterday: http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=134429494917435&w=4 Thanks, Rafael