From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030220Ab2HHJ7d (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Aug 2012 05:59:33 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:36691 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751992Ab2HHJ7b (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Aug 2012 05:59:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 10:59:29 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Lee Jones , Dmitry Torokhov , linus.walleij@stericsson.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: ab8500-ponkey: Make the distinction between DT and non-DT boots Message-ID: <20120808095928.GI16861@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <20120807170333.GV16861@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120808080411.GB4728@gmail.com> <201208080828.35451.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201208080828.35451.arnd@arndb.de> X-Cookie: You will be married within a year. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 08:28:35AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > In general, it seems easier to use the same domain type for both cases. > I don't think that MOP500_AB8500_VIR_GPIO_IRQ_BASE is used anywhere > else besides the .irq_base definition in board-mop500.c, so I would guess > that you can just remove that identifier and always use the linear > domain. Given how easy this is to get working it doesn't seem sensible to avoid it - there's a clear pattern already for maintaining support for legacy domains.