From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
To: Wesley Miaw <wmiaw@netflix.com>
Cc: "Milan Broz" <mbroz@redhat.com>,
"Mikulas Patocka" <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
"device-mapper development" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"Alasdair Kergon" <agk@redhat.com>,
"msb@google.com" <msb@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Will Drewry™" <w@google.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] dm: verity support data device offset (Linux 3.4.7)
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 03:04:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120809020419.GD23758@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0066B4B7-B0FA-4C7F-99C4-0AABB577382C@netflix.com>
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 12:40:22AM +0000, Wesley Miaw wrote:
> Apologies if the version increment is incorrect; I was not sure if the minor
> or patch number should be incremented. I assume the different version number is
> what would be used to detect if the data offset option is supported. Thanks.
Minor number is the correct thing to increment as you're retaining
compatibility. (Your original version would have needed to increment the major
number to indicate incompatibility with existing userspace code.)
However, first you need to address the second part of Mikulas's email,
namely to make the case for these changes rather than making no kernel
changes and instead stacking the verity target over a linear target.
To put this another way, your patch offers an alternative way to do
something we think the existing kernel can already do, so you need to
advance some reasons why you believe the new alternative method is worth
adding to the kernel and explain this in the patch header.
Alasdair
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-09 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-08 18:23 [PATCH] dm: verity support data device offset (Linux 3.4.7) Wesley Miaw
2012-08-08 18:46 ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka
2012-08-08 20:31 ` Milan Broz
2012-08-08 20:46 ` Wesley Miaw
2012-08-08 20:56 ` Milan Broz
2012-08-08 21:53 ` Wesley Miaw
2012-08-09 0:40 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] " Wesley Miaw
2012-08-09 1:53 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2012-08-09 6:35 ` Milan Broz
2012-08-09 17:09 ` Wesley Miaw
2012-08-09 0:40 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] " Wesley Miaw
2012-08-09 2:04 ` Alasdair G Kergon [this message]
2012-08-10 1:00 ` Wesley Miaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120809020419.GD23758@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com \
--to=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbroz@redhat.com \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=msb@google.com \
--cc=w@google.com \
--cc=wmiaw@netflix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).