linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com,
	neilb@suse.de, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, vgoyal@redhat.com,
	mpatocka@redhat.com, sage@newdream.net, yehuda@hq.newdream.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/12] block: Add bio_clone_bioset()
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 19:56:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120809025610.GK7262@moria.home.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120808232120.GK6983@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 04:21:20PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:08:40PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > This consolidates some code, and will help in a later patch changing how
> > bio cloning works.
> 
> I think it would be better to introduce bio_clone*() functions in a
> separate patch and convert the users in a different one.
> 
> >  /**
> > - *	bio_clone	-	clone a bio
> > + *	bio_clone_bioset -	clone a bio
> >   *	@bio: bio to clone
> >   *	@gfp_mask: allocation priority
> > + *	@bs: bio_set to allocate from
> >   *
> >   * 	Like __bio_clone, only also allocates the returned bio
> >   */
> > -struct bio *bio_clone(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > +struct bio *bio_clone_bioset(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > +			     struct bio_set *bs)
> >  {
> > -	struct bio *b = bio_alloc(gfp_mask, bio->bi_max_vecs);
> > +	struct bio *b = bio_alloc_bioset(gfp_mask, bio->bi_max_vecs, bs);
> >  
> >  	if (!b)
> >  		return NULL;
> > @@ -485,7 +487,7 @@ struct bio *bio_clone(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> >  	if (bio_integrity(bio)) {
> >  		int ret;
> >  
> > -		ret = bio_integrity_clone(b, bio, gfp_mask, fs_bio_set);
> > +		ret = bio_integrity_clone(b, bio, gfp_mask, bs);
> >  
> >  		if (ret < 0) {
> >  			bio_put(b);
> > @@ -495,6 +497,12 @@ struct bio *bio_clone(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> >  
> >  	return b;
> >  }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_clone_bioset);
> > +
> > +struct bio *bio_clone(struct bio *bio, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > +{
> > +	return bio_clone_bioset(bio, gfp_mask, fs_bio_set);
> > +}
> 
> So, bio_clone() loses its function comment.  Also, does it even make
> sense to call bio_clone() from fs_bio_set?

I'll re add the function comment if you want, just for a single line
wrapper I don't know if it's worth the cost - comments get out of date,
and they're more stuff to wade through.

> Let's say it's so, then
> what's the difference from using _kmalloc variant?

bio_kmalloc() fails if nr_iovecs > 1024, bio_alloc_bioset() fails if
nr_iovecs > 256

and bio_alloc_bioset() is mempool backed, bio_kmalloc() is not.

AFAICT that's it.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-09  2:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-06 22:08 [PATCH v5 00/12] Block cleanups Kent Overstreet
2012-08-06 22:08 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] block: Generalized bio pool freeing Kent Overstreet
2012-08-08 22:25   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-09  0:26     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-06 22:08 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] dm: Use bioset's front_pad for dm_rq_clone_bio_info Kent Overstreet
2012-08-08 22:06   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-08 23:57     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-11  5:24       ` Joseph Glanville
2012-08-13 21:44         ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-14  5:33   ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2012-08-15 20:46     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-06 22:08 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] block: Add bio_reset() Kent Overstreet
2012-08-08 22:11   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-09  0:07     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-09  6:00       ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-09  6:06         ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-09  6:30           ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-06 22:08 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] pktcdvd: Switch to bio_kmalloc() Kent Overstreet
2012-08-08 22:13   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-09  0:08     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-06 22:08 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] block: Kill bi_destructor Kent Overstreet
2012-08-07  3:19   ` Mike Snitzer
2012-08-09  0:14     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-08 22:22   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-09  0:21     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-09  6:05       ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-09  6:12         ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-09  6:34           ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-15 22:19             ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-06 22:08 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] block: Add an explicit bio flag for bios that own their bvec Kent Overstreet
2012-08-08 22:28   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-06 22:08 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] block: Rename bio_split() -> bio_pair_split() Kent Overstreet
2012-08-06 22:08 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] block: Introduce new bio_split() Kent Overstreet
2012-08-08 22:58   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-09  1:19     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-09  6:44       ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-13 21:55     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-13 22:05       ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-08 23:05   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-09  1:39     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-09  7:22       ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-09  7:33         ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-09 17:32           ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-13 22:09             ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-06 22:08 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] block: Rework bio_pair_split() Kent Overstreet
2012-08-08 23:09   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-06 22:08 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] block: Add bio_clone_kmalloc() Kent Overstreet
2012-08-08 23:15   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-09  1:57     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-09  6:55       ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-09  7:02         ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-09  2:38     ` [PATCH] Consolidate bio_clone_bioset(), bio_kmalloc() Kent Overstreet
2012-08-09  6:56       ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-06 22:08 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] block: Add bio_clone_bioset() Kent Overstreet
2012-08-08 23:21   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-09  2:56     ` Kent Overstreet [this message]
2012-08-09  6:52       ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-09  6:59         ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-06 22:08 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] block: Only clone bio vecs that are in use Kent Overstreet
2012-08-06 23:16   ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka
2012-08-08 23:28     ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-08 23:47       ` Muthu Kumar
2012-08-09  3:19         ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-09  3:25           ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-10  1:50           ` Muthu Kumar
2012-08-09  7:01         ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-10  2:29           ` Muthu Kumar
2012-08-08 23:30   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-09  3:06     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-08-09 17:37   ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-13 21:46     ` Kent Overstreet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120809025610.GK7262@moria.home.lan \
    --to=koverstreet@google.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=sage@newdream.net \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=yehuda@hq.newdream.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).