From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758074Ab2HIMiq (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2012 08:38:46 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:60779 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753177Ab2HIMip (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2012 08:38:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 13:38:38 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Laxman Dewangan Cc: Stephen Warren , Liam Girdwood , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Gyungoh Yoo , Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] regulator: add MAX8907 driver Message-ID: <20120809123838.GP24328@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1344460727-6243-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <1344460727-6243-3-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <5023AAE5.90603@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5023AAE5.90603@nvidia.com> X-Cookie: Be different: conform. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 05:49:49PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > There may be possibility that some of regulator node is not > populated and that case, the idata will be NULL and hence regulator > registration can be bypass for that regulator. The driver should just register all the regulators the chip has, it's useful for diagnostic purposes if nothing else.