From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] hugetlb: correct page offset index for sharing pmd
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:16:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120810131643.GC1425@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJd=RBB8Yuk1FEQxTUbEEeD96oqnO26VojetuDgRo=JxOfnadw@mail.gmail.com>
[CCing Kamezawa and David]
On Fri 10-08-12 20:53:36, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> wrote:
> > On Fri 10-08-12 20:37:20, Hillf Danton wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I guess you mean unmap_ref_private and that has been changed by you
> >> > (0c176d5 mm: hugetlb: fix pgoff computation when unmapping page from
> >> > vma)... I was wrong at that time when giving my Reviewed-by. The patch
> >> > didn't break anything because you still find all relevant vmas because
> >> > vma_hugecache_offset just provides a smaller index which is still within
> >> > boundaries.
> >>
> >> No, as shown by the log message of 0c176d52b, that fix was
> >> triggered by (vma->vm_pgoff >> PAGE_SHIFT), thus I dont see
> >> what you really want to revert.
> >
> > fix for that would be a part of the revert of course.
> >
>
> Fine, go ahead ;)
there you go
---
>From 973187e9bad72181f4563a675ca64235f8612a2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:03:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] hugetlb: do not use vma_hugecache_offset for
vma_prio_tree_foreach
0c176d5 (mm: hugetlb: fix pgoff computation when unmapping page
from vma) fixed pgoff calculation but it has replaced it by
vma_hugecache_offset which is not approapriate for offsets used for
vma_prio_tree_foreach because that one expects index in page units
rather than in huge_page_shift.
Using vma_hugecache_offset is not incorrect because the pgoff will fit
into the same vmas but it is confusing.
Cc: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index c39e4be..a74ea31 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -2462,7 +2462,8 @@ static int unmap_ref_private(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
* from page cache lookup which is in HPAGE_SIZE units.
*/
address = address & huge_page_mask(h);
- pgoff = vma_hugecache_offset(h, vma, address);
+ pgoff = ((address - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT) +
+ vma->vm_pgoff;
mapping = vma->vm_file->f_dentry->d_inode->i_mapping;
/*
--
1.7.10.4
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-10 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-03 12:56 [patch] hugetlb: correct page offset index for sharing pmd Hillf Danton
2012-08-03 13:32 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-10 9:48 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-10 12:07 ` Hillf Danton
2012-08-10 12:27 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-10 12:37 ` Hillf Danton
2012-08-10 12:51 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-10 12:53 ` Hillf Danton
2012-08-10 13:16 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2012-08-10 13:21 ` Hillf Danton
2012-08-10 13:39 ` Hillf Danton
2012-08-10 13:48 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-12 4:08 ` Hillf Danton
2012-08-12 9:31 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-13 12:10 ` Hillf Danton
2012-08-13 13:09 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-13 13:24 ` [PATCH] hugetlb: do not use vma_hugecache_offset for vma_prio_tree_foreach Hillf Danton
2012-08-13 13:49 ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-13 13:51 ` Hillf Danton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120810131643.GC1425@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox