From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753135Ab2HMRHv (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:07:51 -0400 Received: from mail-gh0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:43977 "EHLO mail-gh0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750861Ab2HMRHt (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:07:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:07:45 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: JoonSoo Kim Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: use system_highpri_wq for unbind_work Message-ID: <20120813170745.GH9180@google.com> References: <1344874672-6257-1-git-send-email-js1304@gmail.com> <1344874672-6257-5-git-send-email-js1304@gmail.com> <20120813163601.GC9180@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:02:31AM +0900, JoonSoo Kim wrote: > 2012/8/14 Tejun Heo : > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:17:52AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > Is this from an actual workload? ie. do you have a test case where > > this matters? > > No. it is not from an actual workload. > I got this idea suddenly, during implementing others. > I will do a test for this tomorrow. I don't think it's a bad idea and guess this wouldn't make much difference under most workload. Was mostly wondering whether this came from some crazy phone powersave optimization. Thanks. -- tejun