From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@ti.com>,
linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 for c6x/score/unicore32 archs
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:34:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120814153413.GA18601@localhost> (raw)
Sorry I have no compilers for build testing these changes, however the
risk looks low and it's much better than to leave the arch broken,
considering that Eric will do atomic64_t in the core fs/namespace.c code.
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
Andrew: the arch maintainers have been CCed. Best is the maintainers
respond, test and perhaps take the corresponding change. Let's see how
this will work out..
arch/c6x/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/score/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/unicore32/Kconfig | 1 +
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- linux.orig/arch/c6x/Kconfig 2012-06-14 22:29:58.187502107 +0800
+++ linux/arch/c6x/Kconfig 2012-08-14 23:23:18.147838692 +0800
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ config C6X
select OF
select OF_EARLY_FLATTREE
select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
+ select GENERIC_ATOMIC64
config MMU
def_bool n
--- linux.orig/arch/score/Kconfig 2012-06-14 22:29:58.219502109 +0800
+++ linux/arch/score/Kconfig 2012-08-14 23:23:37.691839156 +0800
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ config SCORE
select ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
select GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
+ select GENERIC_ATOMIC64
choice
prompt "System type"
--- linux.orig/arch/unicore32/Kconfig 2012-07-25 19:09:37.671358715 +0800
+++ linux/arch/unicore32/Kconfig 2012-08-14 23:23:52.351839505 +0800
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ config UNICORE32
select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
select GENERIC_IOMAP
+ select GENERIC_ATOMIC64
help
UniCore-32 is 32-bit Instruction Set Architecture,
including a series of low-power-consumption RISC chip
next reply other threads:[~2012-08-14 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-14 15:34 Fengguang Wu [this message]
2012-08-14 16:22 ` [PATCH] select GENERIC_ATOMIC64 for c6x/score/unicore32 archs Mark Salter
2012-08-15 2:30 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-15 2:36 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-15 13:42 ` Mark Salter
2012-08-15 14:12 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-15 14:19 ` Mark Salter
2012-08-15 5:42 ` guanxuetao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120814153413.GA18601@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=a-jacquiot@ti.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
--cc=lennox.wu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).